Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:23:19.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fabrication of Highly Conductive Pedot Nanofibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Alexis Laforgue  and
Lucie Robitaille
Alexis Laforgue
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Research Council Canada, Industrial Materials Institute, Boucherville, Canada
Lucie Robitaille
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Research Council Canada, Industrial Materials Institute, Boucherville, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) nanofibers were obtained by the combination of electrospinning and vapour-phase polymerization. The fibers had diameters around 350 ± 60 nm, and were soldered at every intersection, ensuring superior dimensional stability of the mats. The nanofiber mats demonstrated very high conductivity (60 ± 10 S/cm, the highest value reported so far for polymer nanofibers) as well as very interesting electrochemical properties, due to the porous and nanostructured nature of the electrospun mats. The mats were incorporated into all-solid flexible supercapacitors that showed interesting performances for applications where flexible and lightweight energy storage devices are required.

Keywords

nanostructurepolymerenergy storage
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1240: Symposium WW – Polymer Nanofibers–Fundamental Studies and Emerging Applications , 2009 , 1240-WW02-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Norris, I. D. and Mattes, B. R. in Handbook of Conducting Polymers, Third Edition, Skotheim, T.E. and Reynolds, J. R., Ed., CRC Press, 2007.Google Scholar
2 Winther-Jensen, B.; West, K. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 4538–4543.Google Scholar
3 El-Aufy, A. K., Nabet, B. and Ko, F. K. Polymer Preprints 2003, 44(2), 134–135.Google Scholar
4 Nair, S.; Hsiao, E.; Kim, S. H. Chemistry of Materials 2009, 21, 115–121.Google Scholar
5 Nguyen, H. D.; Ko, J. M.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, S. K.; Cho, S. H.; Nam, J. D.; Lee, J. Y. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 2008, 8, 4718–4721.Google Scholar
6 Laforgue, A.; Robitaille, L. Polymer Preprints 2008, 49(2), 624–625.Google Scholar
7 Fuller, J.; Breda, A. C.; Carlin, R. T. Journal of Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 459, 29–34.Google Scholar
8 Laforgue, A. ; Robitaille, L. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 4194–4200.Google Scholar
9 Fabretto, M.; Zuber, K.; Murphy, C. H. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2008, 29, 1403–1409.Google Scholar
10 Aasmundtveit, K. E.; Samuelsen, E. J.; Pettersson, L. A. A.; Inganas, O.; Johansson, T.; Feidenhansl, R. Synthetic Metals 1999, 101, 561–564.Google Scholar