Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:01:39.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication and Characterizations of Poly(3-hexylthiophene) Nanofibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Surawut Chuangchote
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kyoto University, Institute of Advanced Energy, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto, 6110011, Japan, +81-774-38-4580, +81-774-38-3508
Michiyasu Fujita
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kyoto University, Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto, Japan
Takashi Sagawa
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kyoto University, Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto, Japan
Susumu Yoshikawa
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kyoto University, Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Conductive nanofibers with the average diameters in the range of 60 nm - 2 μm were fabricated by electrospinning of a mixture of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in a mixed solvent of chlorobenzene and methanol. Beaded fibers and/or uniform, smooth-surface fibers were successfully fabricated. The average diameter of the as-spun fibers decreased and the color of as-spun fibers changed with decreasing the concentration of P3HT or PVP. After the removal of PVP from as-spun fibers by Soxhlet extraction, pure P3HT fibers were obtained as a spindle-like with groove-like morphological appearance which may be widely applicable for some specific applications, such as photovoltaic cells, thin film transistors, and light emitting diodes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Chuangchote, S., Sirivat, A., and Supaphol, P., Nanotechnology 18, 145705 (2007).Google Scholar
2 Madhugiri, S., Dalton, A., Gutierrez, J., Ferraris, J. P., and Balkus, K. J. Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 14531 (2003).Google Scholar
3 Babel, A., Li, D., Xia, Y., and Jenekhe, S. A., Macromolecules 38, 4705 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Chuangchote, S., Sagawa, T., and Yoshikawa, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 787 (2008).Google Scholar
5 Chuangchote, S., Sagawa, T., and Yoshikawa, S., Macromol. Symp. 264, 80 (2008).Google Scholar
6 Chuangchote, S., Sagawa, T., and Yoshikawa, S., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1091E, 1091–AA07 (2008).Google Scholar
7 Chuangchote, S., Sagawa, T., and Yoshikawa, S., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1149E, 1149–QQ11 (2008).Google Scholar
8 Padinger, F., Rittberger, R. S., and Sariciftci, N. S., Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 85 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Yang, X., Loos, J., Veenstra, S. C., Verhees, W. J. H., Wien, M. M., Kroon, J. M., Michels, M. A. J., and Janssen, R. A. J., Nano Lett. 5, 579, (2005).Google Scholar
10 Singh, K. A., Sauve, G., Zhang, R., Kowalewski, T., McCullough, R. D., and Porter, L. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 263303 (2008).Google Scholar