Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:39:56.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

External Gettering and Hydrogenation Effects on Electrical Properties of Multicrystalline Silicon Wafers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

I. Perichaud  and
S. Martinuzzi
I. Perichaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Photoélectricité des Semi-conducteurs, case 231. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Marseille-St. Jérôme, 13397 Marseille Cedex 13, France.
S. Martinuzzi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Photoélectricité des Semi-conducteurs, case 231. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Marseille-St. Jérôme, 13397 Marseille Cedex 13, France.
Get access

Abstract

To reduce the density of recombination centers, external gettering by phosphorus diffusion from a POCI3 source and hydrogénation were applied to 200 μm thick samples.

Gettering was carried out at 850°C or 900°C, for 120 or 240 mn. Hydrogénations result of the annealing of samples at 400°C for 30 mn in gas flow. Thanks to arrays of mesa diodes, it is found that minority carrier diffusion lengths (Ln) are neatly improved by the gettering. The improvements are higher at 900°C than at 850°C, they increase with gettering time and SIMS analyses indicate that they are due to the removing of Fe, Cu and Ni atoms.

Hydrogénation enhances Ln values in samples gettered at 850°C and the higher Ln the longer the gettering time. After hydrogénation, the values of Ln in the samples gettered at 850°C are comparable to those measured in samples gettered at 900°C. It is assumed that hydrogen is able to neutralize the activity of impurities which have not been gettered, like oxygen, and also that of residual metallic impurities.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 262: Symposium E – Defect Engineering in Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Device Technology , 1992 , 481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kang, J. S. et Schroder, D. K., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 2974, 1989.Google Scholar
[2] Ourmazd, A. et Schröter, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 781, 1984.Google Scholar
[3] Hu, S. M., Fahey, P. et Dutton, R. W., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 6912, 1983.Google Scholar
[4] Morehead, F. F. et Lever, R. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 151, 1986.Google Scholar
[5] Tamura, H., Phil. Mag. 35, 663. 1977.Google Scholar
[6] StojadIiovic, S. D., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 54, K5, 1979.Google Scholar
[7] Pearton, S. J. in ‘Hydrogen in semiconductors’, Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol.34, p. 91, Academic Press, 1991.Google Scholar
[8] Andonov, P., Dervin, P. and Lay, P., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1908, 1990.Google Scholar
[9] Périchaud, I. et Martinuzzi, S., Proc. of 22th IEEE Photovoltaic Solar Energy Spec. Conf., pp. 877–882, Las Vegas USA, 1991.Google Scholar
[10] Sopori, B. L., Jones, K. M., Deng, XiaoJun, Matson, R., Al-Jassim, M., Tsuo, S., Doolittle, A., et Rohatgi, A., Proc. of 22th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., Las Vegas, pp. 833–837 1991.Google Scholar
[11] Herring, C. and Johnson, N. M. in réf. [7], p. 229.Google Scholar