Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:37:51.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploiting Nanotech Opportunities: A Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Daniela Baglieri  and
Sara Giordani
Daniela Baglieri
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Messina, Business Economics and Management, Via dei Verdi, 75, Messina, 98122, Italy
Sara Giordani
Affiliation:
[email protected], TTP Lab, Vicenza, 36100, Italy
Get access

Abstract

This paper analyzes the main challenges nanotech start-ups face in turning nanotech inventions into valuable and marketable nanotech innovations, also considering that nanotechnology discoveries could represent “inventions of methods of inventing” (Rothaermel et al., 2007). In the last decades, nanotechnologies have been a burgeoning area of science and engineering which show an increasing potential to transform a broad range of industries, and to boost the US and European firms' competitiveness (OECD, 1998). Although these emerging technologies share some problems with new ventures in other emerging industries ( e.g. biotech), nanotechnology firms have to balance the management of high technical and high market risk, still evolving regulatory frameworks (Bowman et al. 2006) and strategies for entering the business network and for attracting investments, e.g. in the form of potential venture capitalists. Potential investors, in turn, will face the well-known hurdle of the due diligence, considering for example health or safety concerns, manufacturing, availability of distribution channels, etc. (Burden, 2007).We propose that configuring their network and choosing the right market segment are the key strategies nanotech ventures should adopt in pushing their early growth in the global market. We analyze a sample of 15 European nanotech firms which confirm our predictions. Due to the novelty of the topic covered in this study, this research is exploratory in nature.

Keywords

commerceeconomicsstress/strain relationship
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1106: Symposium PP – The Business of Nanotechnology , 2008 , 1106-PP04-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rothaermel, F. T. and Thursby, M. “The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research, Research Policy, vol.36:6, 832–849 (2007).Google Scholar
2 OECD, 21st Century Technologies: Promises and Perils of a Dynamic Future, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, (1998).Google Scholar
3 Bowman, D. M., Hodge, G. A., “Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier” Futures 38 1060–1073, (2006).10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.017Google Scholar
4 Burden, A. P., “Start-ups or upstarts?”, NanoToday, 2:4, (2007).Google Scholar
5 Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M., The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London: Sage, (1994).Google Scholar
6 Gibbons, A., “Incentives in Organization”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 4:115–132, (1998).Google Scholar
7 Siegel, D. and Roco, M. C., “Nanostructure Science and Technology: A Worldwide Study”, Washington DC, National Science and Technology Council, (1999).Google Scholar
8 Chesbrough, H., Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, (2003).Google Scholar
9 Laursen, K. and Salter, A., “Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 27:131–150, (2006).Google Scholar
10 Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A., Markets for technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, Cambridge, MIT Press, (2001).Google Scholar
11 Cohen, M. and Levinthal, D. A., “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, (1990).Google Scholar
12 Zahra, S. A, George, G., “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension”, The Academy of Management Review, 27, 2: 185–203, (2002).Google Scholar
13 Shane, S., Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Elgar, (2004).Google Scholar
14 Gans, J. S., Stern, S., “The Product Market and the Market for “Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs.” Research Policy 32:333–350, (2003).Google Scholar
15 Roberts, E. B., Malonet, D., “Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations”, R&D Management, 26, 1:17–48, (1996).Google Scholar
16 Niosi, J., “Alliances are Not Enough Explaining the Rapid Growth in Biotechnology Firms”, Research Policy, 32:737–750 (2003).10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00083-5Google Scholar
17 Audretsch, D. B., Innovation and Industry Evolution, The MIT Press, (1995).Google Scholar
18 Hagedoorn, J., “Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 5: 371–385 (1993).10.1002/smj.4250140505Google Scholar
19 Maine, E., Probert, D., Ashby, M., “Investing in new materials: a tool for technology managers”, Technovation, 25, 1:15–23, (2005).Google Scholar
20 Wield, D., Roy, R., “R&D and corporate strategies in UK materials-innovating companies”, Technovation, 15, 4:195–210, (1995).Google Scholar
21 Arora, A., Landau, R., and Rosenberg, N., “Dynamics of Comparative Innovation in the Chemical Industry.” (Eds , Mowery and , Nelson), Cambridge University Press, (1999).Google Scholar
22 Walsh, V., Lodorfos, G., “Technological and Organizational Innovation in Chemicals and Related Products” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 14, 3, (2002).Google Scholar
23 Niosi, J., “Strategic Partnerships in Canadian Advanced Materials”, R&D Management, 23:17–27, (1993).Google Scholar
24 Hagedoorn, J., Schakenraad, J., “Inter-Firm Partnerships for Generic Technologies - the Case of New Materials”, Technovation, 11, 7: 429–444, (1991).10.1016/0166-4972(91)90024-XGoogle Scholar
25 Teece, D. J., “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, 15: 285–305, (1986).10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2Google Scholar
26 Gulati, R., “Alliances and network”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317, (1998).Google Scholar
27 Oxley, J. E., “Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, (1997).Google Scholar
28 Ireland, R. Duane, Hitt, M.A., Camp, S. M., Sexton, D. L., “Integration entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth”, Academy of Management Executive, 15, 1, (2001).Google Scholar
29 Thurow, L. C., “Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights”, Harvard Business Review, 75(5): 94–103, (1997).Google Scholar
30 Sullivan, P. H., Value-Driven Intellectual Capital. How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets Into Market Value, New York – Chichester – Weinheim – Brisbane – Singapore –Toronto: Wiley, (2000).Google Scholar
31 Rivette, K. G., Kline, D., Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, (2000).Google Scholar
32 Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., Management dell'Innovazione. L'integrazione del cambiamento tecnologico, organizzativo e dei mercati, (, Italian Ed.). Milan: Guerini e Associati, (1999) – Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, (English Ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley, (1997).Google Scholar
33 Rivette, K. G., Kline, D., “Discovering New Value in Intellectual Property”, Harvard Business Review, January-February: 54-66, (2000).Google Scholar
34 Hill, C. W. L., Jones, G. R., Strategic Management Theory. An Integrated Approach, (5th Ed.), Boston – New York: Houghton Mifflin, (2001).Google Scholar
35 Lambkin, M., Day, G., “Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: beyond the product life cycle”, Journal of Marketing, 53(3): 4–20, (1989).Google Scholar
36 Kohn, T. O., “Small Firms as International Players”, Small Business Economics, 9:45–51, (1997).Google Scholar
37 Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., Schendel, D., “Strategic Reference Point Theory”, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 3:216–236, (1996).Google Scholar
38 Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., Covin, T. J., “Content and Performance of Growth-Seeking Strategies: A Comparison of Small Firms in High-and Low- Technology Industries,“ Journal Of Business Venturing, 5:391–412, (1990).Google Scholar
39 Pitts, R. A., Lei, D., Strategic Management- Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing, (2000).Google Scholar
40 Bresnahan, T. F., Trajtenberg, M., “General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth?” Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108, (1995).Google Scholar
41 Drexler, K. E., Peterson, C., “Nanotechnology and Enabling Technologies”, Foresight Briefing #2, available at: http://www.foresight.org/Updates/Briefing2.html, (1989).Google Scholar
42 Giuri, P., Luzzi, A., “Growth Strategies of European Technology-based SMEs: Markets for Technology vs Markets for Products”, Paper presented to the Academy of Management Conference, Technology and Innovation Management Division, New Orleans, (2004).Google Scholar
43 Tour, J. M., “Nanotechnology: The Passive, Active and Hybrid Sides—Gauging the Investment Landscape from the Technology Perspective“, Nanotechnology Law & Business. Fall issue (2007).Google Scholar
44 Iansiti, M. and West, J., “Technology Integration: Turning Great Research into Great Products”, in Harvard Business Review on Managing High-Tech Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1999). Originally published May-June, (1997).Google Scholar
45 Iansiti, M., “Real-World R&D. Jumping the Product Generation Gap”, Harvard Business Review on Managing High-Tech Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1999), originally published May-June (1993).Google Scholar