Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:52:01.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excavation Damage Zone in the Experimental Deposition Holes at Äspö and Comparison to Existing Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jorma Autio
Affiliation:
Consulting Engineers Saanio&Riekkola Oy, Laulukuja 4, FIN-00420 Helsinki, Finland
Hanna Malmlund
Affiliation:
Consulting Engineers Saanio&Riekkola Oy, Laulukuja 4, FIN-00420 Helsinki, Finland
Thomas Hjerpe
Affiliation:
Consulting Engineers Saanio&Riekkola Oy, Laulukuja 4, FIN-00420 Helsinki, Finland
Maarit Kelokaski
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, FIN-00014University of Helsinki, Finland.
Marja Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, FIN-00014University of Helsinki, Finland.
Get access

Abstract

Disposal in deep, stable bedrock is currently one concept for isolating high-level wastes from the environment. Repository for high-level waste in rock excavated using different drilling techniques is surrounded by an excavation damaged zone (EDZ) which properties have been changed. The micro fracturing of samples taken from the experimental deposition holes in the underground Hard Rock Laboratory at Äspö were investigated by the 14C polymethylmetha-crylate (14C-PMMA) method and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the impact of EDZ on migration. The porosity of the damaged rock zone is clearly higher than the porosity of undisturbed rock. The thickness of the crushed zone with significantly higher porosity is a few millimetres and the average depth of the damaged zone (i.e. a clear increase in porosity found) is from 5 to 20 mm from the hole wall. The apertures of the inter- and intragranular fractures in the crushed zone varied from 5 to 30 μm according to SEM examination. Earlier results of porosity, diffusivity and permeability measurements in granites were compiled and the results of the porosity values of Äspö diorite were compared to the porosity values measured in other types of granites. The results were compiled in permeability-diffusivity-porosity space and were found to form a plane that could be used to estimate the range of diffusivity and permeability of the Äspö diorite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Autio, J., Kirkkomäki, T., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Laajalahti, M., Aaltonen, T. and Maaranen, J., Posiva 99–22 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Autio, J. and Siitari-Kauppi, M. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, edited by McKinley, I.G. and McCombie, C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 506, 1998), p. 597.Google Scholar
3. Siitari-Kauppi, M. and Autio, J. in Water-Rock Interaction, edited by Cidu, R., (Balkema, A.A., The Netherlands, 2001) p. 1387.Google Scholar
4. Andersson, C. and Johansson, Å., Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste management Co, TR02 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Hellmuth, K-H., Siitari-Kauppi, M. and Lindberg, A., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 13, 403 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Hellmuth, K.-H., Lukkarinen, S. and Siitari-Kauppi, M., Isotopenpraxis. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 30, 47 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Väätäinen, K., Timonen, J. and Hautojärvi, A. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C.G. and Pabalan, R.T., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 294, 1993), p. 845.Google Scholar
8. Autio, J., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Timonen, J., Hartikainen, K. and Hartikainen, J, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 35, 19 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Siitari-Kauppi, M., Marcos, N., Klobes, P., Goebbels, J., Timonen, J. and Hellmuth, K-H., The Palmottu Natural Analogue Project, Technical Report 99–12 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Hellmuth, K-H., Klobes, P., Meyer, K., Röhl-Kuhn, B., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Hartikainen, K., Timonen, J., Z. geol. Wiss 23 (5/6), 691 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Parkhomenko, E.I. in Electrical Properties of Rocks, (Plenum Press, New York, 1967) p. 268.Google Scholar