Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:55:51.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of Stress During Interfacial Reactions Between Ni Thin Films and (001) Si Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

D. W. Young
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
H. L. Ho
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
C. L. Bauer
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
S. Mahajan
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
A. G. Milnes
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

Evolution of stress during interfacial reactions between thin films of nickel and (001) silicon substrates has been determined at temperatures ranging from 250 to 325° C by a levered optical beam reflection technique. This technique allows accurate and in situ measurement of composite specimen curvature, thereby providing a continuous measure of stress during ongoing interfacial reactions. In addition, microstructure and phase morphology associated with these reactions have been determined by x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Initially, Ni2Si forms and grows at the original Ni/Si interface, accompanied by an increasing net compressive stress in the composite film. Subsequently, NiSi forms and grows at the Ni2Si/Si interface, accompanied by an increasing net tensile stress in the composite film. The initial compressive stress is attributed to localized formation and growth of Ni2Si into the adjacent silicon substrate, whereas the subsequent tensile stress is attributed to formation and growth of NiSi into the adjacent Ni2Si layer. Time required to effect transition from compressive to tensile stress decreases and magnitude of both stresses decreases with increasing temperature, due to thermally activated reaction processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1. Hoffman, R. W., Physics of Thin Films, Hass, G., Ed., Academic Press, New York 3, 211 1966.Google Scholar
2. Sinha, A. K., Levinstein, H. J. and Smith, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 2423 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Tu, K. N., Chu, W. K. and Mayer, J. W., Thin Solid Films 25, 403 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. d'Heurle, F., Petersson, C. S., Baglin, J. E. E., Placa, S. J. La and Wong, C. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 4208 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Tu, K. N., Alessandrini, E. I., Chu, W. K., Krautle, H. and Mayer, J. W., Jap. J, Appl. Phys. Suppl. 2–1, 669 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Angilello, J., Baglin, J., d'Heurle, F., Petersson, S. and Segmuller, A., Thin Film Interfaces and Interactions, Baglin, J. E. E. and Poate, J. M., Eds., Electrochem. Soc., Princeton (1980).Google Scholar
7. Murarka, S. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 775 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Young, D. W., Ho, H. L., Bauer, C. L., Mahajan, S. and Milnes, A. G., to be published.Google Scholar