Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:08:58.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Cementitious Materials Through History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

David Bonen ,
Mehmet A. Tasdemir  and
Shondeepl. Sarkar
David Bonen
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Dept. Civil Engng., 2145 Sheridan RD. Eavanston, IL 60208, U.S.A.
Mehmet A. Tasdemir
Affiliation:
Istanbul TechnicalUniversity, Dept.Engng. Materials, 80626 Maslak-Istanbul, Turkey
Shondeepl. Sarkar
Affiliation:
Sherbrooke University, Dept.Civil Engng., Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The use of cementitious materials dates back to the beginning of the Epipaleolithic period. Examples for ancient cementitious materials from Israel, Egypt, Turkey, and Italy are numerous.

Prior to Aspdin's patent of portland cement at the first half of the 19th century, cementitious materials were composed of earth, mixture of earth and limestone, calcium sulfates, and slaked lime with and without pozzolans. The latter comprises pozzolanic materials from volcanic and sedimentary origin, crushed burnt clay brick, and dust brick. Frequently, organic fibers were incorporated for reinforcement. This paper describes the evolution of the cementitious materials through time and highlights the durability of ancient cementitious materials as compares to that of portland cement concrete.

Although modem concrete is characterized by its high strength and low permeability, it often faces durability problems. In turn, ancient concretes examined exhibit low strength but have proved to be durable materials. Microstructural examination reveals that the groundmass of the latter has been carbonated and is highly porous. Nevertheless, no specific cracking pattern could be observed. The outstanding performance of ancient concrete structures implies that thermodynamic stability rather that mechanical strength is a key point for a long-term durability.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 370: Symposia Va/Vb – Microstructure of Cement-Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cement... , 1994 , 159
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aharoni, Y., The Archaeology of the Land of Israel from the Prehistoric Beginnings to the End of the First Temple Period, ( The Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1982), p. 344 Google Scholar
2. Bar-Yosef, O., in in The Architecture of Ancient Israel from the Prehistoric to the Persian Period, edited by Katzenstain, E., (The Society for Survey of Israel and its Antiquities, Jerusalem, 1987) p. 29 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
3. Avi-Yonah, M. and Yeivin, S. with the participation of Stekelis, M., The Antiquities of Israel, (Hakibutz Hameuchad Ltd. Tel Aviv, 1955), p. 343 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
4. The Archaeology of Ancient Israel, edited by Ben-Tor, A., (Yale University Press, London, 1992), p. 398.Google Scholar
5. Ronen, A, Bentur, A. and Soroka, I., Paleorient 17[2], 149 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Goren, Y. and Goldberg, P., J. Field Archaeology, 18, 131 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Kingery, W.D., Vandiver, P.B. and Prickett, M., J. Field Archaeology, 15, 219 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Delougaz, P., The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, No 7, Part I, 1 (1933).Google Scholar
9. Campbell, D.H. and Folk, R.L., Concrete International, August, 28 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Ghorab, H.Y., Ragai, J. and Antar, A., Cem. Concr. Res. 16[6] 813 (1986), 17[1] 12 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Regourd, M., Kerisel, J., Deletie, P. and Haguenauer, B.. “Cem. Concr. Res. 18[1] 81 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Shiloh, Y., Foreign Influences on the Masonry of Palestine in the 10th-9th Centuries B.C, Ph.D. thesis, (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1974) p. 178.Google Scholar
13. Bremner, T.W., Holm, T.A. and Stepanova, V.F., in Advances in Cement and Concrete, edited by Grutzeck, M.W. and Sarkar, S.L., (Engineering Foundation, ASCE, New York, 1994), pp. 37–51,Google Scholar
14. Raban, A., Kardom, No. 18, Sept. pp. 31–35 (1981) (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
15. Akman, M.S., Guner, A. and Aksoy, Hakki, in II. Uluslararasi Turk-Islam Bilim Ve Teknoloii Tarihi Kongresi, I.T.U. 1986, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
16. Livingston, R.A., in Structural Repair and Maintenance of Historical Buildings III, edited by Brebbia, C.A. and Rrewer, R.J.B., (Computational Mechanics Publications, 1993), p. 15.Google Scholar
17. Rayment, D.L. and Pettifer, K., Mat. Sci. Techn. 3, Dec., 997- (1987).Google Scholar