Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:58:17.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for the Direct Ejection of Clusters from Non-Metallic Solids During Laser Vaporization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

L. A. Bloomfield ,
Y. A. Yang ,
P. Xia  and
A. L. Junkin
L. A. Bloomfield
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Y. A. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
P. Xia
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
A. L. Junkin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the formation of molecular scale particles or “clusters” of alkali halides and semiconductors during laser vaporization of solids. By measuring the abundances of cluster ions produced in several different source configurations, we have determined that clusters are ejected directly from the source sample and do not need to grow from atomic or molecular vapor. Using samples of mixed alkali halide powders, we have found that unalloyed clusters are easily produced in a source that prevents growth from occurring after the clusters leave the sample surface. However, melting the sample or encouraging growth after vaporization lead to the production of alloyed cluster species.

The sizes of the ejected clusters are initially random, but the population spectrum quickly becomes structured as hot, unstable-sized clusters decay into smaller particles. In carbon, large clusters with odd numbers of atoms decay almost immediately. The hot even clusters also decay, but much more slowly. The longest lived clusters are the magic C50 and C60 fullerenes. The mass spectrum of large carbon clusters evolves in time from structureless, to only the even clusters, to primarily C50 and C60. If cluster growth is encouraged, the odd clusters reappear and the population spectrum again becomes relatively structureless.

The laser vaporization process in non-metallic systems closely resembles multiphoton laser photodissociation of clusters themselves. As a result, the best cluster source samples are powders or powder-like materials. We have found that carbon powder or exfoliated graphite sheet (Union Carbide Grafoil) are the best samples for the production of large carbon clusters. Many previous studies of carbon clusters formed in vacuum may have relied on the vaporization of carbon dust produced by repeated vaporizations in a small region of the sample.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 206: Symposium G – Clusters and Cluster-Assembled Materials , 1990 , 105
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Elsayed-Ali, H. E., Norris, T. B., Pessot, M. A., and Mourou, G. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1212 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Schoenlein, R. W., Lin, W. Z., Fujimoto, J. G., and Eesley, G. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1680 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hicks, J. M., Urbach, L. E., Plummer, E. W., and Dai, H.-L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2588 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dreyfus, R. W., Kelly, R., and Walkup, R. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1478 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Leider, H. R., Krikorian, O. H., and Young, D. A., Carbon 11, 555 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Furstenau, N. and Hillenkamp, F., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 37, 135 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McElvany, S. W., Creasy, W. R., and O’Keefe, A., J. Chem. Phys. 85, 632 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mandich, M. L., Reents, W. D. Jr., and Bondybey, V. E., J. Phys. Chem. 90, 2315 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kelly, R. and Dreyfus, R. W., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B32, 341 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. O’Keefe, A., Ross, M. M., and Baronavski, A. P., Chem. Phys. Lett. 130, 17 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McElvany, S. W., Nelson, H. H., Baronavski, A. P., Watson, C. H., and Eyler, J. R., Chem. Phys. Lett. 134, 214 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Radi, P. P., Bunn, T. L., Kemper, P. R., Molchan, M. E., and Bowers, M. T., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2809 (1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radi, P. P., Hsu, M. T., Brodbelt-Lustig, J., Rincon, M., and Bowers, M. T., J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4817 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Pradel, P., Monchicourt, P., Laucagne, J. J., Perdrix, M., and Watel, G., Chem. Phys. Lett. 158, 412 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kasuya, A. and Nishina, Y., Z. Phys. D 12, 493 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Kabler, M. N. and Patterson, D. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 652 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Overeijnder, H., Tol, R. R., and de Vries, A. E., Surf. Sci. 90, 265 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Dreyfus, R. W., Kelly, R., and Walkup, R. E., Nucl. Instr. and Methods Phys. Res. B 23, 557 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Meijer, G. and Bethune, D. S., J. Chem. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
19. Meijer, G. and Bethune, D. S., Chem. Phys. Lett., in press.Google Scholar