Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:52:04.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Cesium Sujcotitanates as an Alternative Waste Form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Yali Su ,
M. Lou Balmer  and
Bruce C. Bunker
Yali Su
Affiliation:
Pacifie Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
M. Lou Balmer
Affiliation:
Pacifie Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Bruce C. Bunker
Affiliation:
Pacifie Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Silicotitanate ion exchangers are potential materials for the removal of radioactive Cs and Sr from tank wastes. In this paper the viability of direct thermal conversion of Cs-loaded silicotitanates to an acceptable high level waste form has been examined. Results show that in aqueous solutions, the Cs leach rates of crystalline silicotitanates (heat treated at 800°C) are 0.04, 0.18, 0.4 g/m2day for Cs loadings of 1, 5, and 20 wt%, respectively. Heating the Cs-loaded (up to 20 wt %) silicotitanates at or above 900 °C for 1 hour further reduces the Cs leach rates to approximately zero (beyond the lppm detection limits). Moreover, Cs volatilization was found to be < 0.8 wt% at temperatures as high as 1000 °C. These results suggest that thermally converted silicotitanate ion exchangers exhibit excellent chemical durability (comparable to or better than borosilicate glass) and thus, have great potential as an alternative waste form.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 457
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bickford, D. F., Applewhite-Ramsey, A., Jantzen, C. M., and Brown, K. G., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 73, pp. 2896–2902, 1990.Google Scholar
2. Bunker, B. C., “Evaluation of Inorganic Ion Exchangers for Removal of Cs from Tank Wastes”, TWRSPP-94–085, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richalnd, WA, September, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Balmer, M. L., and Bunker, B. C., “Inorganic Ion Exchange Evaluation and Design-Silicotitanate Ion Exchange Waste Conversion”, PNL-10460 UC-2070 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, March, 1995.Google Scholar
4. Dosch, R. G., Brown, N. E., Stephens, H.P., and Anthony, R. G., Waste Management 93, February 28-March 3, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 1751–1754.Google Scholar
5. Klavetter, E.A., Brown, N. E., Tradell, D. E., Anthony, R. G., Gu, D., and Thibaud-Erkey, C., Waste Management 94, February 28-March 3, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 709–719.Google Scholar
6. WHC Internal Memo, Kirkbride, R. A. to Washenfelder, D. J., “Evaluation of the Impact of the Use of Crystalline Silicotitanate Ion Exchanger on High-level Waste Glass Production”, 9457566, March, 1995.Google Scholar
7. Strachan, D. M., Turcotte, R. P., and Barnes, B. O., Nuclear Technology, 56, pp. 306–312, 1982.Google Scholar
8. Gray, W. J., Radioactive Waste Management, 12, pp. 147–169, 1980.Google Scholar
9. Nogues, J. L., Vemaz, E. Y., Jacquet-Francillon, N. in The Scientific Bases for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 44 edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C., (Materials Research Society, 1984).Google Scholar
10. Rana, M. A., and Douglas, R. W., Phys. and Chem. of Glasses, 2, pp. 179–195, 1961.Google Scholar