Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:34:44.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Esca and Sims Study of the Tetrabromobisphenol A Flame Retardant Diffusion to the Metal-Encapsulating Resin Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Alberto Torrisi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy.
Angelo Cavallaro
Affiliation:
SGS Microelettronica, Stradale di Primosole 50, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Antonio Perniciaro
Affiliation:
SGS Microelettronica, Stradale di Primosole 50, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe Ferla
Affiliation:
SGS Microelettronica, Stradale di Primosole 50, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Salvatore Pignataro
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy.
Get access

Abstract

Epoxy resins of novolac type were molded to real copper and nickel plated copper framesin plant conditions. Three resins, formulated with different amount of tetrabromobisphenol A flame retardant, were used. The samples were stored at 200°C and then mechanically fractured at given time intervals. The surfaces obtained in the fracture have been analyzed by ESCA and Ga+ excited static and imaging SIMS. The kinetics of migration of the flame retardant to the resinmetal interfacial zone have been followed. The process was found to be diffusion controlled. Evidence of a redox reaction between the copper oxides found on the surface of the copper frame and the tetrabromobisphenol A was obtained. A copper diffusion through the Ni plating was observed in the case of the nickel plated frames. This phenomenon is most important at the point on the frame where the bromine concentration is higher.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Torrisi, A. and Pignataro, S., Surf. Interf. Anal. 9, 441 (1986).Google Scholar
2.Torrisi, A., Pignataro, S., Nocerino, G., Appl. Surf. Sci. 13, 389 (1982).Google Scholar
3.Torrisi, A., Marletta, G., Puglisi, O., Pignataro, S., Surf. Interf. Anal. 5, 161 (1983).Google Scholar
4.Pignataro, S., Torrisi, A., Ferla, G., Surf. Interf. Anal. 7, 129 (1985).Google Scholar
5.Pignataro, S., Torrisi, A., Puglisi, O., Cavallaro, A., Perniciaro, A., Ferla, G., Appl. Surf. Sci. 25, 127 (1986).Google Scholar
6.Torrisi, A., Cavallaro, A., Licciardello, A., Perniciaro, A., Ferla, G., Surf. Interf. Anal. 10, 306 (1987).Google Scholar
7.Vasquez, P., Puglisi, O., Licciardello, A., Arnold, G.W., Patti, A., Pignataro, S., Surf. Interf. Anal. 10, 327 (1987).Google Scholar
8.Anthony, M.T. and Seah, M.P., Surf. Interf. Anal. 6, 107 (1984).Google Scholar
9.Briggs, D. and Seah, M.P., Practical Surface Analysis, (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1983), p. 496 and references therein.Google Scholar
10.Pospisil, J., in Advances in Polymer Science vol.36, edited by Dusek, K. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1980) p. 69.Google Scholar