Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:30:59.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Epitaxial Growth by Movpe of (Hg,Mn)Te On (001) Gaas Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

H. M. Al-Allak
Affiliation:
University of Durham, School of Engineering and Applied Science, South Road, Durham, DHl 3LE, U.K
A. W. Brinkman
Affiliation:
University of Durham, School of Engineering and Applied Science, South Road, Durham, DHl 3LE, U.K
P. A. Clifton
Affiliation:
University of Durham, School of Engineering and Applied Science, South Road, Durham, DHl 3LE, U.K
P. D. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Durham, School of Engineering and Applied Science, South Road, Durham, DHl 3LE, U.K
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial thin films of the dilute magnetic semiconductor Hg1-xMnxTe have been grown by MOVPE on (100) GaAs substrate with or without buffer layers. Deposition took place in a horizontal, atmospheric pressure reactor at temperatures in the range 350–400° C, using tricarbonyl (methyl cyclopentadienyl) manganese, di-isopropyl tellurium and elemental mercury. Buffer layers consisted of thin layers of ZnTe and an upper thick layer (∼1μm) of CdTe. The good crystallinity was confirmed by RHEED and double crystal x-ray diffraction with rocking curve widths of 500–600 arc. sec. for non-buffered layers, and 315 arc. sec. for buffered layers. TEM investigations show that layers grown on buffered substrates had improved microstructure defect content. Electrical transport measurements revealed that as-grown layers were ptype with Hall mobilities in excess of 0.1 m2V−1s−1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Delves, R. T. and Lewis, B., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 24, 549 (1964).Google Scholar
2. Fardyna, J. K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4, 2002 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kolodziejski, L. A., Sakamoto, T., Gunshor, R. L. and Datta, S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 799 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Nouhi, A. and Stirn, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 2251 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Reno, J., Sou, I. K., Wijewarnasuriya, P. S. and Faurie, J. P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 47, 1168 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Harris, K. A., Hwang, S., Lansari, Y., Cook, J. W. Jr., Schetzina, J. F. and Chu, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A5, 3085 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Clifton, P. A., Brinkman, A. W. and Al-Allak, H. M., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 5, 1067 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Hails, J. E., Russell, G. J., Brinkman, A. W. and Woods, J., J. Cryst. Growth, 79, 940 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Wright, P. J., Cockayne, B., Cattell, A. F., Dean, P. J., Pitt, A. D. and Blakemore, G. W., J. Cryst. Growth, 59, 155 (1982)Google Scholar
10. Tunnicliffe, J., Irvine, S. J., Dosser, O. D. and Mullin, J. B., J. Cryst. Growth, 68, 245 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Clifton, P. A., Mullins, J. T., Brown, P. D., Lovergine, N., Brinkman, A. W. and Woods, J., J. Cryst. Growth, 99, 468 (1990).Google Scholar