Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:43:02.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enzymatically Degradable Synthetic Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Wen Shao
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21205
Kam W. Leong
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21205
Get access

Abstract

Complex coacervation is an appealing method of microencapsulating delicate proteins for controlled drug delivery. Natural polyelectrolytes, such as collagen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and chondroitin sulfate, are popular choices for formulating the microspheres. For advantage of versatility, synthetic systems are attractive. Typical synthetic polyelectrolytes are composed of a carbon-carbon backbone that is nonbiodegradable. To design synthetic polyelectrolytes that are biodegradable, we synthesized diamines containing dipeptide or tripeptide sequences that are enzymatically degradable. The enzymatically degradable linkages comprised gly-phe, gly-phe-phe, or gly-gly-phe, and lysine and 2,3-diaminopropionic acid co-monomers served as the charged component. Using an interfacial polymerization technique, these monomers were condensed with diacyl chlorides, including succinyl, adipoyl, or terephthaloyl chloride to form polyamides. Results of gel permeation chromatography and ninhydrin assays showed that the polymers degraded in PBS containing α-chymotrypsin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shao, W. and Leong, K., J. of Biomat. Sd. - Polym. Ed. (in press)Google Scholar
2. Brown, K., Shao, W., Bathon, J. and Leong, K., Mat Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 331, 73(1994)Google Scholar
3. Subr, V., Duncan, R. and Kopecek, J., J. Biomater. Sc., Polym. Ed., 1(4), 261(1990)Google Scholar
4. Ulbrich, K., Strohalm, J., and Kopecek, J., Biomaterals, 3, 150(1982)Google Scholar