Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:39:05.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Passivation and Temperature Cycling of PCBM - Polymer Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Annick Anctil ,
Andrew Merrill ,
Cory Cress ,
Brian Landi  and
Ryne Raffaelle
Annick Anctil
Affiliation:
[email protected], Rochester Institute of Technology, Microsystems Engineering, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Andrew Merrill
Affiliation:
[email protected], Rochester Institute of Technology, Nanopower Research Laboratories, 85 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Cory Cress
Affiliation:
[email protected], Rochester Institute of Technology, Microsystems Engineering, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Brian Landi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Rochester Institute of Technology, Nanopower Research Laboratories, 85 Lomb Memorial Drive , Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Ryne Raffaelle
Affiliation:
[email protected], Rochester Institute of Technology, Microsystems Engineering, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Get access

Abstract

In the present work, polymer solar cells were fabricated from composite blends of poly[2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene] (MEH-PPV) and poly(3-hexylthiophene)-(P3HT with PCBM[60] and PCBM[70]. The composite blends were used as active layers in an ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/Al device structure. Power conversion efficiencies have been measured from current-voltage (I-V) measurements for each of these different composite blends under simulated AM1.5 illumination. In the case of the MEH-PPV devices, the I-V performance has been measured as a function of polymer molecular weight, type of fullerene derivative (C60 or C70), and PCBM:polymer ratios. The highest efficiencies for the ranges used in this study were obtained using the 150,000 g/mol MEH-PPV molecular weight, the C70 PCBM derivative, and a 1:4 MEH-PPV:PCBM ratio. The effect of thermal cycling on the I-V performance for both MEH-PPV and P3HT devices has also been measured from 77K to 330K. The devices exhibited a positive temperature coefficient for the short-circuit current density (Jsc), which dominated the overall efficiency of the device over this temperature range. Finally, the use of a combination of parylene and polymethylmethacralate for device passivation was shown to provide a dramatic reduction in device degradation under ambient conditions as compared to non-passivated devices.

Keywords

photovoltaicpolymerpassivation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1031: Symposium H – Nanostructured Solar Cells , 2007 , 1031-H09-23
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Kim, K., Liu, J., Namboothiry, M. A. G., Carroll, D. L., Applied Physics Letters 90 (2007) 163511/163511–163511/163513.Google Scholar
[2] Chang, E. C., Chao, C.-I., Lee, R.-H., Journal of Applied Polymer Science 101 (2006) 1919–1924.10.1002/app.23657Google Scholar
[3] Hiorns, R. C., Bettignies, R. de, Leroy, J. Bailly, S. Firon, M. Sentein, C. Khoukh, A. Preud'homme, H., Dagron-Lartigau, C., Advanced Functional Materials 16 (2006) 2263–2273.10.1002/adfm.200600005Google Scholar
[4] Krebs, F. C., Carle, J. E., Cruys-Bagger, N., Andersen, M. Lilliedal, M. R., Hammond, M. A., Hvidt, S. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 86 (2005) 499–516.10.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.002Google Scholar
[5] Krebs, F. C., Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 90 (2006) 3633–3643.10.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.055Google Scholar
[6] Dennler, G. Lungenschmied, C. Neugebauer, H. Sariciftci, N. S., Latreche, M. Czeremuszkin, G. Wertheimer, M. R., Thin Solid Films 511–512 (2006) 349–353.Google Scholar
[7] Ma, W. Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. Heeger, A. J., Macromolecular Rapid Communications 28 (2007) 1776–1780.Google Scholar
[8] Guenes, S. Neugebauer, H. Sariciftci, N. S., Chemical Reviews (Washington, DC, United States) 107 (2007) 1324–1338.Google Scholar
[9] DiLeo, R. A. e. a., Determination of Nanomaterial Energy Levels for Organic Photovoltaics by Cyclic Voltammetry, in: MRS, Boston, 2007.Google Scholar
[10] Jain, S. C., Aernout, T. Kapoor, A. K., Kumar, V. Geens, W. Poortmans, J. Mertens, R. Synthetic Metals 148 (2005) 245–250.Google Scholar
[11] Kim, K. Liu, J. Namboothiry, M. A. G., Carroll, D. L., Applied Physics Letters 90 (2007) 163511/163511–163511/163513.Google Scholar