Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:48:44.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Ionic Conduction at the Film/Substrate Interface in LiI Thin Films Grown on Sapphire(0001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. Lubben
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O.Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6030.
F. A. Modine
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O.Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6030.
Get access

Abstract

The ionic conductivity of LiI thin films grown on sapphire(0001) substrates has been studied in situ during deposition as a function of film thickness and deposition conditions. LiI films were produced at room temperature by sublimation in an ultra-high-vacuum system. The conductivity of the Lil parallel to the film/substrate interface was determined from frequency-dependent impedance measurements as a function of film thickness using Au interdigital electrodes deposited on the sapphire surface. The measurements show a conduction of ∼5 times the bulk value at the interface which gradually decreases as the film thickness is increased beyond 100 nm. This interfacial enhancement is not stable but anneals out with a characteristic log of time dependence. Fully annealed films have an activation energy for conduction (σT) of ∼0.47 ± .03 eV, consistent with bulk measurements. The observed annealing behavior can be fit with a model based on dislocation motion which implies that the increase in conduction near the interface is not due to the formation of a space-charge layer as previously reported but to defects generated during the growth process. This explanation is consistent with the behavior exhibited by CaF2 films grown under similar conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Dudney, N. J., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 19, 103 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Liang, C. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 1289 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Jow, T. and Wagner, J. B. Jr., J. Electrocem. Soc. 126, 1963 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Shahi, K. and Wagner, J. B. Jr., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 6 (1981).Google Scholar
5 Nakamura, O. and Goodenough, J. B., Sol. State Ionics 7, 119 (1982).Google Scholar
6 Poulsen, F.W., Andersen, N.H., Kindl, B., and Schoonman, J., Sol. State Ionics 9&10, 119 (1983).Google Scholar
7 Chang, M. R.-W., Shah, K., and Wagner, J. B. Jr., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1213 (1984).Google Scholar
8 Fujitsu, S.,Miyayama, M.,Koumoto, K.,Yanagida, H.,andKanazawa, T.,J.Mater. Sci. 20,2103 (1985).Google Scholar
9 Dudney, N. J., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 70, 65 (1987).Google Scholar
10 Modine, F. A. and Lubben, D., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 2658 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Kliewer, K. L. and Kohler, J. S., Phys. Rev. 140, A1226 (1965).Google Scholar
12 Maier, J., Sol. State Ionics 23, 59 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Dudney, N. J., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 68, 65 (1985).Google Scholar
14 Schreck, E., Läuger, K., and Dransfield, K., Z. Phys. B62, 331 (1986).Google Scholar
15 Macdonald, J. R., in Impedance Spectroscopy, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1987).Google Scholar
16 Jackson, B. J. H. and Young, D. A., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 1973 (1969).Google Scholar
17 Schlaiker, C. and Liang, C. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 1447 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Poulsen, F. W., Sol. State Ionics 2, 53 (1981).Google Scholar
19 Maier, J., Phys. Stat. Sol. A112, 115 (1989).Google Scholar
20 estimated valueGoogle Scholar
21 Johnston, W. G., Phys. Rev. 98, 1777 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Wassermann, B., Martin, T. P. and Maier, J., Sol. State Ionics 28–30, 1514 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Wassermann, B., Hönle, W., and Martin, T. P., Sol. State Comm. 65, 561 (1988).Google Scholar