Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:17:22.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy Minimization During Epitaxial Grain Growth: Strain VS. Interfacial Energy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. A. Floro
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
R. Carel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
C. V. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated Epitaxial Grain Growth (EGG) in polycrystalline Ag films on Ni (001) substrates. EGG is driven by minimization of crystallographically anisotropie free energies such as the film/substrate interfacial energy and the film strain. Under some conditions EGG results in the preferred growth of the (111) epitaxial orientations that are predicted to minimize the interfacial energy. However, when Ag films are deposited on Ni (001) at low temperature, EGG experiments consistently find that (111) oriented grains are consumed by grains with (001) orientations predicted to have much higher interface and surface energy. The large elastic anisotropy of Ag can account for this discrepancy. The film thickness and the deposition temperature (relative to the grain growth temperature) determine whether strain energy or interface energy minimization dominates orientation evolution during grain growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thompson, C. V., Floro, J. A., and Smith, Henry I., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 4099 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Floro, J. A. and Thompson, C. V., in Thin Film Structures and Phase Stability, Clemens, B. M. and Johnson, W. L., eds. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 187, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1989), p. 273–8.Google Scholar
3. Gao, Y., Dregia, S. A., and Shewmon, P. G., Acta Metall. 37, 1627 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gao, Y., Dregia, S. A., and Shewmon, P. G., Acta Metall. 37, 3165 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Thompson, C. V., Acta Metall. 36, 2929 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Floro, J. A. and Thompson, C. V., Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1137 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Floro, J. A., Thompson, C. V., Carel, R., and Bristowe, P. D., submitted to J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar
8. Schultz, L. G., J. Appl. Phys. 20, 1030 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1978) p. 295.Google Scholar
10. Bassett, Charles S. and Massalski, T. B., Stucture of Metals 3rd. ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
11. Nix, W. D., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 2217 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hirth, John Price and Lothe, Jens, Theory of Dislocations (John Wiley, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
13. Thermal Expansion - Metallic Elements and Alloys in Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 12 (IFI/Plenum, New York).Google Scholar
14. Handbook of Precious Metals Savitskii, E. M., Editor (Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York) p. 127.Google Scholar
15. Properties and Selection: Non-Ferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Metals, in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., Vol. 2 (ASM, Metals Park, Ohio) p. 1143,1156.Google Scholar
16. Thompson, C.V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 237 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar