Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:44.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emission of Terahertz Radiation from Doped Silicon Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lv Pengcheng ,
James Kolodzey ,
R. Thomas Troeger ,
Sangcheol Kim  and
S.K. Ray
Lv Pengcheng
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
James Kolodzey
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
R. Thomas Troeger
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
Sangcheol Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
S.K. Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
Get access

Abstract

Recent interest in biological imaging, remote sensing, and biochemical spectroscopy has made nanoscale Terahertz (THz) emitters based on semiconductors become extremely attractive. THz lasers with good performance (emitting over 1 milliWatt CW at 10 K) have been fabricated from the group III-V compounds by molecular beam epitaxy, but such devices are complex with over 500 quantum wells and barriers and are incompatible with low cost Si processing. Similar devices from the SiGe system have had difficulties because the strain limits the total number of active layers, and have produced relatively poor performance (peak powers near 5 nW), even using strain symmetric active regions on virtual substrates of relaxed SiGe buffers. We report here on the characteristics of a new type of THz emitting device with higher powers (above 0.1 milliWatt) based on radiative impurity transitions in doped silicon, which can be simply fabricated without Ge alloying.

The THz emitters were fabricated from both p-type and n-type doped silicon wafers with typical resistivities of 5 Ω-cm, using conventional photolithography and metal contact lift off. Samples were electrically pulsed and the electroluminescence was measured by Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometry. At 4.2 K, the emission spectra showed several peaks centered around 8.1 THz for the boron doped device, 7 to 13 THz for the gallium doped device, and 6.6 THz for the phosphorus doped device. The electroluminescence was attributed to radiative transitions from excited p-like to s-like hydrogenic dopant states, with emission energies in remarkable agreement with the known dopant absorption levels. Current-voltage measurement suggested an excitation mechanism based on impact ionization of neutral dopants by hot carriers. The net quantum efficiency (emitted photons per injected electron) was estimated to be up to 2 × 10-3. The temperature dependence will be reported with operation above 30 K.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 832: Symposium F – Group IV Semiconductor Nanostructures , 2004 , F4.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1. Cheville, R.A., and Grischkowsky, D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 1960, (1995).Google Scholar
2. Han, P.Y., Cho, G.C., and Zhang, X.C., Opt. Lett., 25, 242, (2000).Google Scholar
3. Johnson, J. L., Dorney, T. D., and Mittleman, D. M., IEEE J. Select. Top. Quantum Elect., 7(4), 592, (2001).Google Scholar
4. DeLucia, F. C., “Spectroscopy in the Terahertz spectral region” in sensing with Terahertz radiation, Mittleman, D., ed. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 39–115.Google Scholar
5. Kohler, R., Tredicucci, A., Beltram, F., Beere, H.E., Linfield, E.H., Davis, A.G., Ritchie, D.A., Lotti, R.C., and Rossi, F., Nature, 417, 156, (2002).Google Scholar
6. Kagan, M. S., Altukhov, I. V., Chirkova, E.G., Sinis, V. P., Troeger, R. T., Ray, S. K., and Kolodzey, J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b), 235, 135, (2003).Google Scholar
7. Pavlov, S. G., Hubers, H. W., Riemann, H., Zhukavin, R.K., Orlova, E. E., and Shastin, V. N., J. Appl. Phys., 92, 5632, (2002).Google Scholar
8. Shastin, V. N., Zhukavin, R.K., Orlova, E. E., Pavlov, S. G., Rummeli, M. H., Hubers, H. W., Hovenier, J.N., Klaassen, T. O., Riemann, H., Bradley, I.V., and van der Meer, AFG, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80, 3512, (2002).Google Scholar
9. Adam, T. N., Troeger, R.T., Ray, S.K., Lv, P.-C., and Kolodzey, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 83, 1713, (2003).Google Scholar
10. Lv, P.-C., Troeger, R. T., Adam, T. N., Kim, S., Kolodzey, J., Yassievich, I. N., Odnoblyudov, M. A., Kagan, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 22, (2004).Google Scholar
11. Lv, P.-C., Troeger, R. T., Kim, S., Ray, S. K., Goossen, K. W., Kolodzey, J., Yassievich, I. N., Odnoblyudov, M. A., Kagan, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 3660, (2004).Google Scholar
12. Lax, M., Phys Rev., 119, 1502, (1960).Google Scholar
13. Onton, A., Fisher, P., and Ramdas, A.K., Phys. Rev., 163, 686, (1967).Google Scholar
14. Lynch, S. A., Bates, R., Paul, D. J., Norris, D.J., Cullis, A. G., Ikonic, Z., Kelsall, R. W., Harrison, P., Arnone, D.D., and Pidgeon, C. R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, 1543, (2002).Google Scholar