Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:21:10.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electroplated and Plasma Enhanced Magnetron Sputtered Ta and Cr Coatings for High Temperature and High Pressure Operation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sabrina L. Lee ,
Rong H. Wei ,
Mark Todaro  and
Paul Cote
Sabrina L. Lee
Affiliation:
[email protected], US Army, ARDEC-Benet Labs, #1 Buffington Street, Watervliet, NY, 12189-4050, United States, 518-266-5503, 518-266-4661
Rong H. Wei
Affiliation:
[email protected], Southwest Research Institute, Material Engineering, San Antonio, TX, 78238, United States
Mark Todaro
Affiliation:
[email protected], US Army, Benet Labs, Watervliet, NY, 12189-4050, United States
Paul Cote
Affiliation:
[email protected], US Army, Benet Labs, Watervliet, NY, 12189-4050, United States
Get access

Abstract

For A723 steel large caliber gun barrel applications, high pressure (∼700MPa), rapid cyclic heating-cooling (∼1250°C), and aggressive propellant gases (CO, CO2, H2O, H2, N2, NH3, CH4, H2S etc) operational environment can cause severe wear and erosion damages to the bore, reducing the service life of the component.Refractory bore coatings can help protect the steel bore to extend service life. Cr electroplating process is currently being widely used in industry and in the military, but toxic wastes from the process are difficult and expensive to dispose. Plasma enhanced magnetron sputtering techniques are being developed for potential replacement of the Cr electroplating process. In this work, we compared A723 steel specimens coated with electroplated Cr and plasma enhanced magnetron sputtered Ta and Cr coatings. The specimens were subjected to analytical testing, including scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, metallography; and adhesion testing, including groove test, a pulsed laser heat test to simulate cyclic thermal environment of the bore, and actual firing test. Steel samples electroplated with HC (high contraction) Cr showed extensive pre-deposition cracks, it also showed cohesive failures under groove adhesion test. When subjected to cyclic high pressure and temperature operation, gas-metal interactions led the as-deposited cracks to grow wider and new cracks to develop, allowing hot pressurized propellant gases to penetrate the cracks and erode the steel substrate. Plasma enhanced sputtered Ta and Cr coatings on steel were harder and denser compared to conventional magnetron sputtered coatings. Under groove testing, they showed no cracks, no cohesive and no adhesive failures. When subjected to cyclic pulsed laser heating simulation at 1490°K, thick sputtered Ta showed no crack, no delamination, and no failures. A heat affected zone was observed in steel, which was caused by tempered to untempered martensite conversion. Our data also showed that Ta sputtered in Ar consisted of minimum interface meta-stable tetragonal Ta fingers, which converted to bcc Ta in the heat affected zone; Ta sputtered in Kr consisted of 100% stable bcc Ta under similar experimental conditions.

Keywords

coatingCrTa
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 987: Symposium PP – Materials Research at High Pressure , 2006 , 0987-PP03-13
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ahmad, I., Gun Propulsion Technology, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics Series, AIAA, Washington DC (1988), 311–355.Google Scholar
2. Cote, P., and Rickard, C., Wear 241 (2000) 17–25.Google Scholar
3. Cote, P., Lee, S.L., Todaro, M., Kendall, G., J. Pressure Vessel Tech. Vol.125 (2003) 335–341.Google Scholar
4. Cote, P., Todaro, M., Kendall, G., Witherell, M., Surf. Coat. Tech. 163–164 (2003) 478–483.Google Scholar
5. Truszkowska, K., Wotzak, M., Yee, F., Vigilante, G., Cipollo, M., SVC 47th Annual Tech. Conf. proc. (2004) 282–288.Google Scholar
6. Yee, F., Wotzak, M., Cipollo, M., Truszkowska, K., SVC 47th Annual Tech. Conf. (2004) 17–21.Google Scholar
7. Mulligan, C., Smith, S., Vigilante, G., Gun Tubes Conf., Keble College Oxford, hosted by Cranfield Univ. RMCS, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA (2005).Google Scholar
8. Lee, S.L., Mueller, J., Collins, L., Cipollo, M., Mulligan, C., Vigilante, G., SVC 48th Annual Tech. Conf. (2005) 511–518.Google Scholar
9. Cipollo, M., Lee, S.L., Mulligan, C., Wotzak, M., SVC 48th Annual Tech. Conf. (2005) 519–523.Google Scholar
10. Wei, R., Lange, E., Rincon, C., Arps, J., Lanning, R., Surf. Coat. Tech. (2006).Google Scholar
11. Underwood, J., Parker, A., Vigilante, G., Cote, P., J. Press. Vessel Tech., 125 (2003) 299–304.Google Scholar
12. Lee, S.L., Cipollo, M., Windover, D., Rickard, C., Surf. Coat. Tech. 120–121 (1999) 44–52.Google Scholar
13. Lee, S.L., Windover, D., Audino, M., Matson, D.W., McClanahan, E.D., Surf. Coat. Tech. 149 (2002) 62–69.Google Scholar