Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:10:16.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Materials in Biological Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

William F. Regnault  and
Grace Lee Picciolo
William F. Regnault
Affiliation:
Food and Drug Administration, Division of Mechanics and Materials Science, 12200 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville MD 20852
Grace Lee Picciolo
Affiliation:
Food and Drug Administration, Division of Mechanics and Materials Science, 12200 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville MD 20852
Get access

Abstract

Decisions concerning patient care, which are routinely made by the attending physician, based on experience and clinical laboratory analyses, will eventually be supplemented or even replaced by real-time, quantified, health assessments from cutaneous and indwelling multisensor probes. These probes will employ a multitude of technologies including optical and solid state techniques for the precise measurement of body analytes such as blood gases, electrolytes, pH, glucose, etc. In addition to clinical monitoring, these sensors will also be used to provide feed-back for closed-loop therapeutic systems.

Currently, there are rapid advances being made in sensor technology and its application for the determination of various analytes. However, a major problem still remains at the device/body interface, especially when chronic implantation is required.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 55: Symposium G – Biomedical Materials , 1985 , 273
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Anonymous, in Sensor Products and Markets for Monitoring of Blood Gases, other Body Fluid Substances and Hemedynamic Parameters Report #7042, (Information Resources International, Inc. Tustin, CA, 1984)Google Scholar
2. Gillette, P., in Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, edited by Ko, W. H. (Futura Publishing Co., Mount Kisco, NY, 1985) pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
3. Mansouri, S. and Schultz, J. S., in Proceedings of the Symposium on Biosensors, edited by Potvin, A. R. and Neuman, M. R. (IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1984) pp. 112–115.Google Scholar
4. Wise, K. D., in Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, edited by Ko, W. H. (Futura Publishing Co., Mount Kisco, NY, 1985) pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
5. Konecny, E., Hattendorff, H.-D. and Leiss, M. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Biosensors, edited by Potvin, A. R. and Neuman, M. R. (IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1984) pp. 110–111.Google Scholar
6. Dyson, C. W., Gehrich, J. L. and Yafuso, M., presented at the 1983 AmSECT Meeting April 12 (Abstract); O. Demierre, B.Walpoth, D. Maass, E. Schmid, E. Garcia, and M. Turnia; B. A. Winn, J. B. Riley, M. S. Jallan, and M. B. Hurdle, presented at the 1983 AmSECT Meeting April 12 (Abstract).Google Scholar
7. Voorhees, W. D. III and Geddes, L.A., in Proceedings of the Symposium on Biosensors, edited by Potvin, A. R. and Neuman, M. R. (IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1984) pp. 20–23.Google Scholar
8. Sigdell, E. J., in Seminar Proceedings from Biomedical Business International, Inc.: New Technology Report #5033, (Biomedical Business International, Inc. Tustin, CA)Google Scholar
9. Shichiri, M., Kawamori, R., Yamasaki, Y., Hakui, N., Asakawa, H., and Abe, H., in Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, edited by Ko, W. H. (Futura Publishing Co., Mount Kisco, NY, 1985) pp. 197–210.Google Scholar
10. Clark, L. C. Jr. and Lyons, C., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 102, 29–45 (1962).Google Scholar
11. Kazacos, M., Skalsky, M. and Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Life Support Syst. 3, 189–205 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Ko, W. H. and Spear, T., in Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, edited by Ko, W. H. (Futura Publishing Co., Mount Kisco, NY, 1985) pp. 259–304.Google Scholar
13. Shichiri, M., Kawamori, R., Yamasaki, Y., Hakui, N., Asakawa, H., and Abe, H., in Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, edited by Ko, W. H. (Futura Publishing Co., Mount Kisco, NY, 1985) pp. 197–210.Google Scholar
14. Clemens, A. H., Chang, P. H., and Myers, R. W., Horm. Metab. Res.(Suppl.) 7, 22–23 (1977).Google Scholar
15. Baier, R. E., in Contemporary Biomaterials, edited by Boretos, J. W. and Eden, M. (Noyes Publications, Perk Ridge, NJ, 1984) pp. 92–126.Google Scholar
16. Anderson, J. M. and Miller, K. M., Biomaterials 5, 5–10 (1984).Google Scholar
17. Szycher, M. and McArthur, W. A., in Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials: Second Symposium, edited by Fraker, A. C. and Griffin, C. D. (ASTM Publication Code Number 04-859000-27 ASTM, Philad. PA) 1985.Google Scholar
18. Fraticelli, Y. M. and Meyerhoff, M. E., Anal. Chem. 53, 1857 (1981).Google Scholar
19. Baier, R. E., Meyer, A. E., Akers, C. K., Natiella, J. R., Meenaghan, M., and Carter, J. M., Biomaterials 3, 241–245 (1983).Google Scholar
20. Skiens, W. E. and Williams, J. L., in Biocompatible Polymers, Metals, and Composites, edited by Szycher, M. (Technomic Publishing Co., Inc. Lancaster, PA, 1983), pp. 1001–1018.Google Scholar
21. North, J. R., in Seminar Proceedings from Biomedical Business International, Inc.: New Technology Report #5033, (Biomedical Business International, Inc. Tustin, CA)Google Scholar
22. Kronick, M. N. and Little, W. A., J. Immunol. Meth. 8, 235–240 (1975).Google Scholar