Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:16:56.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Device Fabricated From Polyaniline / Single walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P.C. Ramamurthy
Affiliation:
MSE, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
A.M. Malshe
Affiliation:
ECE, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
W.R. Harrell
Affiliation:
ECE, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
R.V. Gregory
Affiliation:
MSE, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
K. McGuire
Affiliation:
Physics & Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
A.M. Rao
Affiliation:
Physics & Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Composites of high molecular weight polyaniline and single walled carbon nanotubes are investigated for applications to electronic devices. Electrical characteristics of devices fabricated using this composite show an order magnitude higher current level than those measured in the neat polyaniline devices. Composite materials and devices with various weight percentages of single walled carbon nanotubes were also fabricated. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of these devices indicate a significant increase in current with an increase in carbon nanotube concentration in the composite. Analysis of the forward I-V characteristics of these composite devices on a log-log scale shows two power law regions. In the lower voltage range, the exponent is 1, which is consistent with ohmic conduction, while in the higher voltage range, the exponent is between 1.1 and 1.5, which is consistent with space-charge-limited conduction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hassanien, A., Gao, M., Tokumoto, M., and Dai, L., Chem. Phys. Lett. 342, 479 (2001)Google Scholar
2. Cochet, M., Maser, W.K., Benito, A.M., Callejas, M.A., Martínez, M.T., Benoit, J.M., Schreiber, J., and Chauvet, O., Chem. Comm. 16, 1450 (2001)Google Scholar
3. Ramamurthy, P.C., Harrell, W.R., Gregory, R.V., Sadanadan, B., and Rao, A.M., Synth. Met. 137, 1497 (2003)Google Scholar
4. Curran, S.A., Ajayan, P.M., Blau, W.J., Carrol, D.L., Coleman, J.N., Dalton, A.B., Davey, A.P., Drury, A., McCarthy, B., Maier, S., and Strevens, A., Adv. Mater. 10, 1091 (1998)Google Scholar
5. Journet, C., Maser, W. K., Bernier, P., Loiseau, A., Chapelle, M. L., Lefrant, S., Deniard, P., Leek, R. and Fischerk, J. E., Nature 388, 756 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Beadle, P.M., Nicolau, Y.F., Banka, E., Rannou, P., and Djurado, D., Synth. Met. 95, 29 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Wei, Y., Hsueh, K.F., and G.Jang, W., Polymer 16, 3572 (1994)Google Scholar
8. Angelopoulos, M., Dipietro, R., Zheng, W.G., MacDiarmid, A.G., and Epstein, A.J., Synth. Met. 84, 35 (1997)Google Scholar
9. long, J. P., Bullock, S. E., Buckley, L. J., and Russell, J. N. Jr , Synth. Met. 126, 317 (2002)Google Scholar
10. Bao, Z. X., Liu, C. X., Kahol, P. K., and Pinto, N. J., Synth. Met. 106, 107 (1999)Google Scholar
11. Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed., (Wiley, New York, 1981), pp. 254263.Google Scholar
12. Zengin, H., Zhou, W., Jin, J., Czerw, R., Smith, D. W. Jr, Echegoyen, L., Carroll, D. L., Foulger, S.H. and Ballato, J., Polymer Preprints 44(1), 1105 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Lampert, M. A. and Mark, P., Current Injection in Solids (Academic, New York, 1970), pp.1425.Google Scholar
14. Kao, K. C. and Hwang, W., Electrical Transport in Solids Vol 14 (Pergamon Press, New York, 1981), pp.145159.Google Scholar