Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T15:51:29.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrochemical and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Studies of UO2 Fuel Oxidation by Specific Radicals Formed During Radiolysis of Groundwater*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. Sunder ,
D. W. Shoesmith ,
H. Christensen ,
M. G. Bailey  and
N. H. Miller
S. Sunder
Affiliation:
Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Est. PINAWA, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
D. W. Shoesmith
Affiliation:
Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Est. PINAWA, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
H. Christensen
Affiliation:
Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Est. PINAWA, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
M. G. Bailey
Affiliation:
Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Est. PINAWA, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
N. H. Miller
Affiliation:
Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Est. PINAWA, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
Get access

Abstract

The effects of groundwater radiolysis on the oxidation and dissolution of UO2 has been studied. The production of a specific radical was maximized by using suitable solution chemistry, and the effect of a particular radical was investigated. Experiments were performed to study the effects of OH, O2, and CO, radicals. An electrochemical cell and a UO2 electrode were designed to do ijri situ electrochemical measurements in gamma fields, 300 -20 Gy/h. During radiolysis, the oxidation of UO2 was monitored by recording the corrosion potential of the UO2 electrode as a function of time. The fastest increase and highest corrosion potentials were observed in solutions favoring the formation of O2 radicals. XPS analysis of the UO2 surface showed that oxidation has proceeded beyond the UO2.33 stage. Computer calculations of water radiolysis showed that steady-state concentrations of the radicals are very low, about 10−9 mol-dm−3, in most cases, and even lower if the reactions with the UO2 surface are included. The radicals are produced at a much faster rate than the observed changes in the corrosion potential, suggesting thereby that another slower reaction is corrosion rate controlling.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 127: Symposium BERLIN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII , 1988 , 317
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Lemire, R.J. and Tremaine, P.R., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 25, 361 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G., Stanchell, F.W. and Mclntyre, N.S., J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 130, pp 163–179, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W., Lunansky, G.E., Bailey, M.G. and Tremaine, P.R., Nucl. Tech. 56, 238 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J., J. Electroanal. Chem. 150, 217 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G., Wallace, G.J. and Stanchell, F.W., Applic. of Surf. Sci. 20, 39 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G., and Wallace, G.J., Can. J. Chem. 66, 259–265 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Allen, A.O., The radiation Chemistry of Water and Aqueous Solutions, D. Van Nostrana Co. Inc. (1961).Google Scholar
8. Gromov, V., Rad. Phys. Chem. 18, 135–146 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Christensen, H. and Bjergbakke, E., Nucl. Chem. Waste. Manag. 6, 265 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Christensen, H. and Bjergbakke, E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Eds.), Material Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 84, pp 115–122 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Johnson, L.H. and Bailey, M.G., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, Werme, L.O. (Ed.), Material Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 50, pp 309–316 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Johnson, L.H., Bailey, M.G., Wallace, G.J., and Snaglewski, A. P., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Eds.), Material Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 84, pp 103–113 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Ikeda, B.M., in The Corrosion Performance of Nuclear Fuel Waste Containers, Nuttall, K. and McKay, P. (Eds.), Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-340, pp. 87–94 (1985)*.Google Scholar
14. Mclntyre, N.S., Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stanchell, F.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 714 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Christensen, H., Bailey, M.G., and Miller, N., (unpublished).Google Scholar
16. Carver, M.B., Hanley, D.V. and Chaplin, K.R., AECL-6413 (1979).Google Scholar
17. Smith, H.J., Tait, J.C. and Von Mass, R.E.ów, Radioactive Decay Properties of Bruce “A” CANDII™ UP, Fuel and Recycle WAs te, AECL-9072 (1987).Google Scholar