Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:37:25.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electroactive Polymerized Vesicles as Stable Biomaterials for Charge Storage Systems and Electron Coupling Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Ivan Stanish
Affiliation:
Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Ave. Washington D.C. 20375
Alok Singh
Affiliation:
Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Ave. Washington D.C. 20375
Get access

Abstract

Diacetylenic phospholipids with disulfide functionality were synthesized and incorporated at dopant levels with unmodified diacetylenic phosphatidylcholine lipids in polymerized vesicles. These polymerized vesicles were immobilized on Au films and structurally characterized in situ using AFM and ESEM and demonstrated surface stability of at least three days. Polymerized diacetylenic phospholipid vesicles displayed retention of entrapped ferricyanide with a half-life of 2.4 weeks at pH 7 and 25 oC. Membrane-bound benzoquinone mediated electron transport across polymerized vesicle membranes providing an initial current of 25 mA and a final charge capacity based on entrapped ferricyanide of 3.5 Ahr/kg. Electron transport across polymerized diacetylenic phospholipid vesicle membranes was described by a pseudosteady-state transport model and was found to be diffusion limited.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fendler, J.H., Membrane Mimetic Chemistry, Wiley Interscience, New York, NY (1982).Google Scholar
2. Gregoriadis, G., Liposome Technology Vol 1–3, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1993).Google Scholar
3. Lasic, D.D., Trends Biotech. 16(7), 30 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Vicheze, C., Bittman, R., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 22, 2937 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Komatsu, H., Rowe, E.S., Biochemistry 30(9), 2463 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Lasic, D.D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 33, 1685 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Shamsai, B.M. Monbouquette, H.G., J. Membrane Sci. 130, 173 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Ringsdorf, H., Schlarb, B., Venzmer, J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 27, 113 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Disher, B.M., Won, Y.-Y., Ege, D.S., Lee, J. C.-M., Bates, F.S., Disher, D.E., Hammer, D.A., Science 284, 1143 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Singh, A., Markowitz, M., Tsao, L.-I., Synth. Comm. 22, 2293 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Stanish, I., Santos, J.P., Singh, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 1008 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Stanish, I., Lowy, D.A, Tender, L.M., Singh, A., J. Phys. Chem. B. (2002) (in press).Google Scholar
13. Robinson, J.N., Cole-Hamilton, D.J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 20, 49 (1991).Google Scholar