Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:12:47.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Properties of Sbcl5, Icl, Hno3, and Br2 Intercalated Pitch Based Carbon Fibers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

V. Natarajan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
John A. Woollam
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
Get access

Abstract

Highly graphitized pitch based carbon fibers with heat treatment temperatures (HTT) of 2500°C, and 3000°C have been intercalated with SbCl5, ICl, HNO3, and Br2. These were reacted either by themselves alone, or in double sequence (e.g. Br2 followed by SbCl5). The electrical resistivities of individual fibers were then measured in air, and as a function of temperature, to a series of temperatures, to test air and thermal stability. The lowest resistivity found in this sequence so far is 28 micro ohm cm when ICl intercalation was followed by HNO3 reaction. These conductors are sometimes air stable (depending on intercalant) at room temperature and can be heated somewhat, but begin to deintercalate at much lower temperatures than was found for CuCl2 intercalated fibers [1,2]. In comparison with the CuCl2 reaction with pitch fibers, these intercalants react easily, and thesequential intercalations appear to give lower final resistivities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research supported by Grant NAG-3-95 from the NASA Lewis Research Center. Cleveland, Ohio.

References

REFERENCES

1. Oshima, H. Woollam, J.A., and Yavrouian, A., “Metallic Conductivity and Air Stability in Copper Chloride Intercalated Carbon Fibers”, J. of Appl. Phys., Nov. 1982, to be published.Google Scholar
2. Oshima, H. Woollam, J.A. Yavrouian, A., and Dowell, M.B., “Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Copper Chloride Intercalated Pitch Based Carbon Fibers”, Synthetic Metals, 1982, to be published.Google Scholar
3. Vogel, F.L., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 982 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Vogel, F.L. Foley, G.M.T. Zeller, C. Falardeau, E.R., and Gan, J., Mater. Sci. Eng. 31, 261 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Davis, G.P. Endo, M., and Vogel, F.L., “Intercalation of Vapor Grown Graphite Fibers”, 15th Biennial Conference on Carbon, Extended Abstracts and Program, June 1981, p. 363.Google Scholar
6. Singer, L.S., U.S. Patent 4, 005, 183 (25 January 1977).Google Scholar
7. Bright, A. Singer, L.S., Carbon 17, 59 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Woollam, J.A. Oshima, H. Haugland, E., and Yavrouian, A., “Shubnikov-deHaas and Negative Magnetoresistance Effects in Copper Chloride Intercalated Carbon Fibers” (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. Chieu, T.C. Timp, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Endo, M. (proceedings of this Symposium).Google Scholar