Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:54:31.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Conductivity of Anisotropic iPP Carbon Nanotube Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2012

Parvathalu Kalakonda
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.
Erin A. Gombos
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Sciences - Physics, Assumption College, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.
Gajinder S. Hoonjan
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Sciences - Physics, Assumption College, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.
Georgi Y. Georgiev*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Sciences - Physics, Assumption College, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
Germano S. Iannacchione
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.
Peggy Cebe
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
*
*indicates corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Polymer and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) nanocomposites exhibit many properties that are not present in either the pure polymer or CNTs. The polymer crystallization kinetics and crystal forms are greatly changed by dispersion of CNTs nanotubes. In addition to various thermophysical properties, CNTs are metallic or semiconductive and highly anisotropic while the polymer hosts are typically excellent insulators and isotropic. In this work, measurements of the electrical conductivity, σ, of thin-film nanocomposites of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and CNTs as a function of CNT concentration (0, 1, 2, and 5% by weight of CNT) and melt-shearing induced anisotropy in σ between parallel and perpendicular to the shearing axis is presented and compared them with analogous data for their thermal transport properties. The iPP host is itself one of the most widely used polymers, has liquid crystalline phases, and it is expected that iPP/CNT nanocomposites will be widely used in many polymer applications, some of which are for flexible electrodes, medical and electronics packaging and chemical sensors. The effect of melt-shearing is expected to induce anisotropy in the various properties of the iPP/CNT thin film that should be particularly apparent in the electrical conductivity of the polymer films, higher in the direction of the alignment and lower in the direction perpendicular to it. With increasing CNT content, the average conductivity 〈σ〉 increases slightly from 0 to 2% CNT then dramatically increases by eight orders of magnitude for 5%. The shear induced property of anisotropy, δσs = (σ − σ) / 〈σ〉, overall increases with CNT content, revealing a large spike for the 1% sample, indicating the possibility of enhanced δσs due to optimized orienting procedures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Georgiev, G., McIntyre, M. B., Judith, R., Gombos, E. A. and Cebe, P., in Symposium Artificially Induced Crystalline Alignment in Thin Films and Nanostructures (Cambridge Journals Online, Cambridge University Press, UK, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceeding, 1308, Warrendale, PA, 2011), DD07–09, DOI:10.1557/opl.2011.157, mrsf10-1308-dd07-09 Google Scholar
2. Kalakonda, P., Gombos, E. A., Georgiev, G. Y., Iannacchione, G.S. and Cebe, P., in Transport Properties in Polymer Nanocomposites II, (Cambridge Journals Online, Cambridge University Press, UK, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceeding, 1410, Warrendale, PA, 2012), DD4.1; Control ID: 1130077 DOI: 10.1557/opl.2012.350 Google Scholar
3. Gojny, F., Wichmann, M., Fiedler, B., Kinloch, I., Bauhofer, W., Windle, A., Schulte, K., Polymer 47(6), 2036 (2006)Google Scholar
4. Li, L., Jeu, W., Faraday Discuss. 128, 299319 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Georgiev, G., Cabrera, Y., Wielgus, L., Iftikhar, Z., Mattera, M., Gati, P., Potter, A. and Cebe, P., in Artificially Induced Grain Alignment in Thin Films, edited by Matias, V., Hammond, R., Moon, S.- H., Hühne, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1150, Warrendale, PA, 2009), RR04-16, p. 185190.Google Scholar
6. Song, W., Kinloch, I.A., Windle, A.H., Science 302, 1363 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Dawid, A., Gwizdała, W., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 355, 13021306 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Gwizdała, W., Górny, K., Gburski, Z., Journal of Molecular Structure 887, 148151 (2008).Google Scholar
9. Georgiev, G., Gombos, E. A., McIntyre, M., Mattera, M., Gati, P., Cabrera, Y. and Cebe, P., in Nanoscale Pattern Formation, edited by Chason, E., Cuerno, R., Gray, J., Heinig, K.-H., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1228E, Warrendale, PA, 2010), KK11–81.Google Scholar
10. Kim, I., Tannenbaum, A., Tannenbaum, R., Carbon 49(1)5461 (2011).Google Scholar
11. Sarkar, S., Kalakonda, P., Georgiev, G.Y., Iannacchione, G.S. and Cebe, P., in Transport Properties in Polymer Nanocomposites II, Annual meeting of the Materials Research Society, (Boston, Dec. 2011) Paper# DD4.2; Control ID: 1158918. Under review.Google Scholar