Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T14:32:05.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elastic Properties of Three Bulk Metallic Glasses. Evolution Versus Temperature in the Glass Transition Region and Influence of Crystallisation.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

B. Van De Moortele ,
J.M. Pelletier ,
J.L. Soubeyroux  and
I.R. Lu
B. Van De Moortele
Affiliation:
GEMPPM, INSA, Bat. 502, INSA, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
J.M. Pelletier
Affiliation:
GEMPPM, INSA, Bat. 502, INSA, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
J.L. Soubeyroux
Affiliation:
CRETA, CNRS, Grenoble, France
I.R. Lu
Affiliation:
DLR, Köln, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Three bulk metallic glasses, with different resistance against crystallisation, were investigated using DSC experiments, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and mechanical spectroscopy. Like in other non-crystalline materials, the elastic modulus exhibits a large decrease above the glass transition temperature. In materials with a large supercooled region (Pd-Ni-Cu-P for instance), this decrease can reach three decades, leading to an attractive glass forming ability. In contrast, in bulk metallic glasses in which onset of crystallisation occurs very rapidly above Tg, this decrease is on less than one decade. A correlation is made with the microstructure evolution revealed by X-Ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 644: Symposium L – Supercooled Liquid, Bulk Glassy and Nanocrystalline State of Alloys , 2000 , L10.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- Inoue, A., Kawase, D., Tsai, A.P., Zhang, T. and Masumoto, T., Mat. Sci. Eng. A178, p. 255 (1994).Google Scholar
2- Inoue, A., Mater. Sci. Forum 179–181, p. 691 (1995).Google Scholar
3- Busch, R., Schneider, S., Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Letters 67, p. 1544, (1995).Google Scholar
4- Johnson, W.L., Mater. Sci. Forum 225–227, p. 35 (1996).Google Scholar
5- Ye, Li, Schwarz, R.B., Mandrus, D. and Jacobson, L., J. Non Cryst. Sol. 205–207, p. 602 (1996).Google Scholar
6- Schneider, S., Thigarajan, P. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Letters 68, p. 493 (1996).Google Scholar
7- Xing, L.Q. and Ochin, P., Acta Mater. 45, p. 3765 (1997).Google Scholar
8- Gilbert, C.J., Richie, R.O. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Letters 71, p.476 (1977).Google Scholar
9- Liu, J.M., Wiedenmann, A., Gerold, U., Kinderling, U. and Wollenberger, H., Phys. Stat. Sol (b), 199, p. 379 (1997)Google Scholar
10- Spriano, S., Antonione, C., Doglione, R., Batteazzati, L., Cardoso, C., Soares, J.C. and Silva, M.F. Da, Phil. Mag. B, 76, p. 529 (1997).Google Scholar
11- Xing, L.Q., Herlach, D.M., Cornet, M., Bertrand, C., Dallas, J.P., Trichet, M.F. and Chevallier, J.P., Mat. Sci. Eng. A226–228, p. 874 (1997).Google Scholar
12- Gebert, A., Eckert, J. and Schultz, L., Acta Mater. 46, p. 5475 (1998).Google Scholar
13- Kawamura, Y., Shibata, T., Inoue, A. and Masumoto, T., Acta Mater. 46, p. 253 (1998).Google Scholar
14- Xing, L.Q., Bertrand, C., Dallas, J.P. and Cornet, M., Mat. Sci. Eng. A241, P. 216 (1998).Google Scholar
15- Wang, W.H., Wei, Q. and Friedrich, S., J. Mat. Sci., 35, p.2291 (2000).Google Scholar
16- Pelletier, J.M., Perez, J. and Soubeyroux, J.L., J. Non Cryst. Sol., 274, p.301 (2000).Google Scholar
17- Löffler, J.F. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Letters, 76, p.3394 (2000).Google Scholar
18- Löffler, J., Schröers, J. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Letters, 77, p. 681 (2000).Google Scholar
19- Lu, I.R., Gorler, G.P., Fecht, H.J. and Willnecker, R., J. Non Cryst. Sol., 274, p. 294 (2000).Google Scholar
20- Schöers, J., Johnson, W.L. and Busch, R., Appl. Phys. Letters, 77, p. 1158 (2000).Google Scholar
21- Kawamura, Y. and Inoue, A., Appl. Phys. Letters, 77, p. 1114 (2000).Google Scholar
22- Etienne, S., Cavaillé, J.Y., Perez, J., Point, R. and Salvia, M., Rev. Sci. Instr. 53, p. 1261 (1982).Google Scholar
23- Ward, I.M. and Hadley, D.W., “Introduction to the Mechanical Properties of Polymers”, Wiley, New-York (1993).Google Scholar
24- Gauthier, C., Chailan, J.F. and Chauchard, J., Polymers and Polymer Composites, 1, p. 309A (1993).Google Scholar
25- Pelletier, J.M., Perez, J., Duffrene, L and Sekkat, A., J. Non Cryst. Sol., 258, p. 119 (1999).Google Scholar