Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:24:36.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficient Thin Polymer Solar Cells with Post-Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shun-Wei Liu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Academia Sinica, Institute of Chemistry, No. 128, Academia Rd., Taipei 11542, Taiwan, Taipei, N/A, Taiwan, +886-02-27898538, +886-02-27831237
Chih-Chien Lee
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Department of Electronic Engineering, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Ping-Tsung Huang
Affiliation:
[email protected], RiTdisplay Corporation, Hsin-Chu, 303, Taiwan
Chin-Ti Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Academia Sinica, Institute of Chemistry, Taipei, 11542, Taiwan
Juen-Kai Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Taiwan University, Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

The authors report the study of the dependence of the device performance of polymer solar cells based on single 50-nm heterojunction poly(3-hexylthiophene)/[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methylester (P3HT/PCBM) layer on annealing process. Annealing before and after cathode deposition were performed for comparison. In the case of post-annealing at 150¢XC for 60 min., the device attains a conversion efficiency of 4.9%, a fill factor of 53 %, and an open-circuit voltage of 0.67 V. These values are comparable with the highest values reported previously. The annealing process is expected to modify the network morphology of the P3HT/PCBM layer. This study demonstrates that it is possible to attain good solar cell performance with the combination of single thin active layer and post-annealing treatment. This may open up an opportunity to fabricate tandem polymer solar cells.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Green, M. A., Emery, K., King, D. L., Igari, S., Warta, W., Prog. Photovoltaics 13, 49 (2005).10.1002/pip.598Google Scholar
2. Shockley, W., Queisser, H. J., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510 (1961).10.1063/1.1736034Google Scholar
3. Green, M. A., “Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology and System Applications,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1982).Google Scholar
4. Tang, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 183 (1986).10.1063/1.96937Google Scholar
5. Yu, G., Gao, J., Hummelen, J. C., Wudl, F., Heeger, A. J., Science 270, 1789 (1995).10.1126/science.270.5243.1789Google Scholar
6. Peumans, P., Bulovic, V., Forrest, S. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2650 (2000).10.1063/1.126433Google Scholar
7. Blom, P. W. M., Mihailetchi, V. D., Koster, L. J. A., and Markov, D. E., Adv. Mater. 19, 1551 (2007).10.1002/adma.200601093Google Scholar
8. Li, G., Shrotriya, V., Huang, J., Yao, Y., Moriarty, T., Emery, K., and Yang, Y., Nature Materials 4, 864 (2005).10.1038/nmat1500Google Scholar