Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:24.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Substrate Temperature and Gas Phase Chemistry on the APCVD of a Si:H Films From Disilane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Richard J. McCurdy  and
Roy G. Gordon
Richard J. McCurdy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
Roy G. Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

The atmospheric pressure thermal decomposition of disilane to produce a Si:H films was studied between 450 and 520° C in a laminar flow reactor. The structural properties of the films exhibited a strong dependence not only on substrate temperature but also on reactor flow position. Films deposited at higher substrate temperatures had less dihydride bonding in the films while the monohydride bonding remained relatively constant. Despite a decrease in the total hydrogen content of the films as the deposition temperature increased from 450 to 500° C, the AM1 photoconductivity increased over an order of magnitude and the hole diffusion length of the films doubled. In addition to the changes in structural and electrical properties as a function of substrate temperature, variations in these properties were also observed as a function of flow position. At early flow positions the amount of dihydride bonding in the films was small and the AM1 photoconductivity and hole diffusion lengths of the films increased. The flow dependence of the film properties is explained by changes in the film precursors due to the evolution of the gas phase chemistry.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 118: Symposium E – Amorphous Silicon Technology , 1988 , 97
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Gau, S. C., Weinberger, B. R., Akhtar, M., Kiss, Z., and MacDiarmid, A. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 436 (1981)Google Scholar
Kurtz, S. R., Proscia, J., and Gordon, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 249 (1986)Google Scholar
[2] Chu, T. L., Chu, S., Ang, S. T., Lo, D. H., Duong, A., Hwang, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1319 (1986)Google Scholar
[3] McCurdy, R. J. and Gordon, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. (1988) in press.Google Scholar
[4] Chu, T. L., Chu, S. S., Ang, S. T., Duong, A., Han, Y. X., and Liu, Y. H., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 4268 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Mahan, A.H., Raboisson, P., and Tsu, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 335 (1987).Google Scholar
[6] Jasinski, J. M., Meyerson, B. S., and Scott, B. A., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 38, 109 (1987).Google Scholar
[7] Scott, B. A., Estes, R. D. and Beach, D. B., Pure and Applied Chem. (in press).Google Scholar
[8] Jasinski, J. M. and Chu, J. O., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 1678 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] McCurdy, R. J. and Gordon, R. G., to be published.Google Scholar
[10] Meyerson, B. S., Scott, B. A., and Tsui, R., Chemtronics 1, 150 (1986).Google Scholar