Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:14:54.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Residual Stress on the Measurement of Hardness and Elastic Modulus using Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

G.M. Pharr
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251
T.Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251
A. Bolshakov
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251
W.C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Nano Instruments, Inc., P.O. Box 14211, Knoxville, TN 37914
Get access

Abstract

The effects of stress on the measurement of hardness and elastic modulus in aluminum alloy 8009 have been studied experimentally and by finite element simulation. The experiments were performed by making a linear array of nanoindentations on the side of a stressed bend bar, sampling regions of high uniaxial tension, high uniaxial compression, and a variety of stresses in between. When analyzed according to standard methods, the nanoindentation data reveal a decrease in both hardness and modulus with increasing stress from compression to tension. While the decrease in hardness is consistent with previous observations made in conventional hardness testing, the modulus decrease was unexpected. Finite element simulation revealed that the drops in hardness and modulus are not real, but occur because the procedure for determining contact area from the nanoindentation load-displacement data does not account for pileup around the indentation. The finite element simulation shows that large compressive stresses promote pileup while tensile stresses reduce it, and this must be properly accounted for if accurate hardnesses and moduli are to be obtained. Experimental results are presented which further support this point of view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. LaFontaine, W.R., Paszkiet, C.A., Kohronen, M.A., and Li, Che-Yu, J. Mater. Res. 6, 2084 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Sines, G. and Carlson, R., ASTM Bulletin, 35, February (1952).Google Scholar
3. Kokubo, S., Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University 21, 256 (1932).Google Scholar
4. Oppel, G.U., Experimental Mechanics 21, 135 (1964).Google Scholar
5. Simes, T.R., Mellor, S.G., and Hills, D.A., J. Strain Analysis 19, 135 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Blain, P.A., Metal Progress, 99, January (1957).Google Scholar
7. Vitovec, F.H., in Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering, ASTM STP 889, edited by Blau, P.J. and Lawn, B.R. (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1986), p.175.Google Scholar
8. Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., in preparation for submission to J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar
9. Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., in preparation for submission to J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar
10. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar