Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:59.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Possible Spin-Spin Interactions on EPR spectra of Cu2+ exchanged Faujasite–X (I)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Chrispin B. O. Kowenje ,
Barry R. Jones  and
Charles W. Kanyi
Chrispin B. O. Kowenje
Affiliation:
[email protected], Binghamton University, State University of New York, Chemistry, Chemistry Dept, Sci. II Bld, Vestal Parkway East., Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000, United States, 1-607-777-2769, 1-607-777-4478
Barry R. Jones
Affiliation:
[email protected], Binghamton University, State University of New York, Chemistry, United States
Charles W. Kanyi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Binghamton University, State University of New York, Chemistry, United States
Get access

Abstract

The interpretation of the continuous wave electron paramagnetic resonance (CW-EPR) spectra of Cu2+ exchanged in Faujasite zeolite is not straightforward. Recent literature points to the role of both Cu2+ zeolite sites and Cu2+ relationship to lattice Al in determining the parameters of Cu2+ spin Hamiltonian. Our work shows that at low concentration, Cu2+ EPR signals show negligible spin-spin interactions. At higher Cu (II) concentrations, a third CW-EPR spectrum that has contributions from both the CW-EPR and the spin-spin interactions, appears.

Keywords

electron spin resonanceion-exchange materialcatalytic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 900: Symposium O – Nanoparticles and Nanostructures in Sensors and Catalysis , 2005 , 0900-O12-25
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maxwell, I. E. and Boer, J.J. De, J. Phys. Chem. 79, 1874–1877 (1975).Google Scholar
2 Xiao, F.-S., Zhang, W., Jia, M., Yu, Y., Fang, C., Tu, G., Zheng, S., Qiu, S. and Xu, R.; Catalysis today, 50, 117–123 (1999).Google Scholar
3 Miao, S.; Wang, Y.; Ma, D.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, S.; Su, L.; Tan, D. and Bao, X.; J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 17866–17871 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Fechtelkord, M., Posnatzki, B. and J.-Chr. Buhl, Zeolites, 19, 334–342 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Campa, M.C., dovina, V. In, Minelli, G., Moretti, G., Pettiti, I., Porta, P., and Riccio, A., Catal. Lett, 23, 141 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Topchieva, K.U.,; Thuong, Ho Shi, Khim, Fak, and Mosk, , Gos Univ. im. Lomonosova, Moscow, USR. Kinetika I Kataliz, 14(3), 756–9 (1973).Google Scholar
7 Böhlmann, W., Pöppl, A., and Michel, D., A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 158, 235–240 (1999).Google Scholar
8 Pierloot, K., Delabie, A., Groothaert, M. H., and Schoonheydt, R. A., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 (11), 2174–2183 (2001).Google Scholar
9 Delabie, A., Pierloot, K., Groothaert, M., Weckhuysen, B. M., and Schoonhydt, R. A., Microporous and mesoporous Materials. 37, 209–227 (2000).Google Scholar
10 Salodino, A. and Larsen, S., J. Phys. Chem. A., 107, 5583–5587 (2003).Google Scholar
11 Deshpande, S., Srinivas, D., and Ratnasamy, P., J. Catalysis, 188, 261–269 (1999).Google Scholar
12 Carl, P. and Larsen, S., Journal of catalysis 182, 208–218 (1999).Google Scholar
13 Dedecek, J., Sobalik, Z., Tvaruazkova, Z., Kaucky, D., and Wichterlova, B., J. Phys. Chem. 99(44), 16327–16337 (1995).Google Scholar
14 Yu, J., Kim, J., and Kevan, L., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 40, 135–147 (2000).Google Scholar
15 Carl, P. J. and Larsen, S. C., J. Phys. Chem. B, 104(28), 6568–6575 (2000).Google Scholar
16 Matar, K. and Goldfarb, D., J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3100–3109 (1992).Google Scholar
17 Gurin, V.S., Bogdanchikova, N. E., and P, V., petranovskii, Materials science and engineering C 18, 37–44 (2001).Google Scholar
18 Abragam, A. and Bleaney, B.. “Electron paramagnetic resonance of transition ions,” (Dover Publications, Inc. NY, 1986) pp 457–540.Google Scholar
19 Figgis, B. N. and Hitchman, M. A., “Ligand field theory and its applications,” (Wiley-VCH. New York 2000) pp 179–225.Google Scholar
20 Owenius, R., Engstrom, M., Lindgren, M., and Huber, M., J. Phys. Chem. A, 105(49), 10967–10977 (2001).Google Scholar
21 Bennur, T. H., Srinivas, D., and Ratnasamy, P., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 48, 111–118 (2001).Google Scholar