Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:23:40.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Operating Conditions on Bimodal Atomic Force Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2013

Ishita Chakraborty  and
Dalia G. Yablon
Ishita Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Corporate Strategic Research, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering, Annandale, NJ 08801, U.S.A.
Dalia G. Yablon
Affiliation:
SufaceChar LLC, Sharon, MA 02067, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Bimodal Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a recently developed dynamic AFM technique. Recent work [1] has shown the existence of different regimes of operation in Bimodal AFM depending on the operating conditions. The current work focuses on the effects of different operating parameters while imaging an impact copolymer blend of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene-propylene (E-P) rubber. The higher mode amplitude and phase contrasts reverse at different points between the PP and rubber regions as the free amplitude of the higher eigenmode is increased. The observed contrast reversal suggests that the cantilever kinetic energy and its free air drive input energy play a role in determining the regimes of operation. Understanding the role of cantilever dynamics in determining these operation regimes will help guide a more rational operation of Bimodal AFM.

Keywords

nanoscalepolymerscanning probe microscopy (SPM)
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1557: Symposium Y – Advances in Scanning Probe Microscopy for Imaging Functionality on the Nanoscale , 2013 , mrss13-1557-y07-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kiracofe, D., Raman, A., and Yablon, D. G.. Understading the energy of cantilever eigenmodes: Multiple regimes of operation in bimodal AFM. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 4: 385–393, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, R.. Multifrequency, repulsive-mode amplitude-modulated atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 89(11):113121 –113121–3, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, C., Zerson, M., Riesch, C., Gigler, A. M., Stark, R. W., Rehse, N., and Magerle, R.. Nanotomography with enhanced resolution using bimodal atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 92(14):143107 –143107–3, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, N., Lozano, J., Herruzo, E., Garcia, F., Richter, C., Sulzbach, T., and Garcia, R.. Bimodal atomic force microscopy imaging of isolated antibodies in air and liquids. Nanotechnology, 19(38):384011, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Martin, D., Herruzo, E., Dietz, C., Gomez-Herrero, J., and Garcia, R.. Noninvasive protein structural flexibility mapping by bimodal dynamic force microscopy. Physical Review Letters, 106(19):198101, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chawla, G. and Solares, S.. Mapping of conservative and dissipative interactions in bimodal atomic force microscopy using open-loop and phase-locked-loop control of the higher eigenmode. Applied Physics Letters, 99(7):074103–074103, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, S., Martinez, N., Lozano, J., and Garcia, R.. Force microscopy imaging of individual protein molecules with sub-pico newton force sensitivity. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 20(6):516–523, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, T. and Garcia, R.. Compositional mapping of surfaces in atomic force microscopy by excitation of the second normal mode of the microcantilever. Applied Physics Letters, 84(3):449–451, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigler, A., Dietz, C., Baumann, M., Martinez, N., Garcia, R., and Stark, R.. Repulsive bimodal atomic force microscopy on polymers. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 3:456, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, R.. Dynamics of repulsive dual-frequency atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 94(6):063109–063109, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, I. and Yablon, D. G.. Cantilever energy effects in bimodal AFM: Phase and amplitude contrast of multicomponent samples, submitted, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar