Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:43:23.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Multiple Scattering on Ultrasonic Velocity, Attenuation and Backscattering Noise in Polycrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. Bruce Thompson
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
James H. Rose
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
S. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Get access

Abstract

Understanding the propagation of ultrasonic waves in polycrystals is important in nondestructive evaluation, both for the purpose of properly detecting or interpreting signals scattered from discrete flaws and for characterizing the microstructure itself. In this paper, the use of the unified theory for elastic wave propagation, developed by Stanke and Kino and based on the second order Keller approximation, is first discussed. After a brief review of the general formalism, recent extensions to the case of polycrystals with preferred grain orientation and elongation are presented. Particular attention is placed on a case commonly found in stainless steels in which the [001] crystallographic axes are aligned and the grains are elongated in the same direction. Techniques to predict the backscattered noise, based on single scattering approximation are then discussed and data motivating the need for extension to include multiple scattering is described. Finally, ways in which these theories can be used to provide improved characterizations of microstructures is indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stanke, F. E. and Kino, G. S., J. Appl. Phys. 7.5, 665 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Keller, J. B., Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Applied Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, New York, 1964), p. 145.Google Scholar
3. Ahmed, S. and Thompson, R. B., in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 10B, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum, New York, 1991), p. 1999.Google Scholar
4. Ahmed, S. and Thompson, R. B., “Effect of Preferred Grain Orientation and Grain Elongation on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation on Stainless Steel,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 11, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).Google Scholar
5. Margetan, F. J., Gray, T. A. and Thompson, R. B., in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 10B, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, 1991), p. 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Margetan, F. J. and Thompson, R. B., “Microstructural Noise in Titanium Alloys and its Influence on the Detectability of Hard-Alpha Inclusions,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. II, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).Google Scholar
7. Rose, J. H. in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 10B, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, 1991), p. 1715.Google Scholar
8. Rose, J. H., “Ultrasonic Backscattering from Microstructure,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. U1, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).Google Scholar
9. Thompson, R. B., Margetan, F. J., Han, K. and Shamblen, C., “Relationship of Microstructure to Backscattered Ultrasonic Noise,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. ii, edited by Thompson, D. O. and Chimenti, D. E. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).Google Scholar
10. Papadakis, E. P. in Physical Acoustics Vol- XIX Ultrasonic Measurement Methods, edited by Thurston, R. N. and Pierce, A. D. (Academic Press, Boston, 1990), p. 107.Google Scholar
11. Thompson, R. B., Smith, J. F., Lee, S. S. and Johnson, G. C., Metal. Trans. A, 20A, 2431 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Clark, A. V. Jr., Thompson, R. B., Li, Y., Reno, R. C., Blessing, G. V., Mitrakovic, D. V., Schramm, R. E., and Matlock, D., Res. Nondestr. Eval. Z, 239 (1990).Google Scholar