Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:31:42.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Mineralogy on the Sorption of Strontium and Cesium Onto Calico Hills Tuff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2001, Bldg 4500N, MS-6201, Oak Ridge TN 37831-6201
W. D. Arnold
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2001, Bldg 4500N, MS-6201, Oak Ridge TN 37831-6201
F. I. Case
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2001, Bldg 4500N, MS-6201, Oak Ridge TN 37831-6201
G. D. O’Kelley
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2001, Bldg 4500N, MS-6201, Oak Ridge TN 37831-6201
J. F. Land
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2001, Bldg 4500N, MS-6201, Oak Ridge TN 37831-6201
Get access

Abstract

Sorption and desorption measurements were made of strontium and cesium onto clinoptilolite and Calico Hills tuff. The object was to see whether there was a correlation between sorption of strontium and cesium onto Calico Hills Tuff and the clinoptilolite based on the content of clinoptilolite in the Calico Hills Tuff. If sorption onto Calico Hills Tuff is solely due to the presence of clinoptilolite, then the ratios of the sorption ratios on tuff to those on clinoptilolite at similar conditions should be the weight fraction of the clinoptilolite in the tuff. Since the tuff contained about 50% clinoptilolite, the ratios would be expected to be about 0.5 if sorption was due solely to clinoptilolite. The experimental evidence showed that the ratios were generally near 0.5 for both cesium and strontium sorption and that ion-exchange processes were operative for both the clinoptilolite and the tuff. However, the ratios differed to a small extent for different conditions, and there were indications that other sorption processes were also involved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Daniels, W. R., Wolfsberg, K., Rundberg, R. S., Ogard, A. E., Kerrisk, J. F., Duffy, C. J., Newton, T. W., Knight, S. D., Lawrence, F. O., Rundberg, V. L., Sykes, M., Thompson, G., Travis, B., Treher, E., Vidale, R., Walter, G., Aguilar, R., Cisneros, M., Maestas, S., Mitchell, A., Oliver, P., Raybold, N., and Wanek, P., Summary Report on the Geochemistry of Yucca Mountain and Evirons, LA–9328–MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Palmer, D. A., Shiao, S. Y., Meyer, R. E., and Wethington, J. A., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 43, 3317 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Meyer, R. E., Arnold, W. D., Blencoe, J. G., O’Kelley, G. D., Case, F. I., Progress in Evaluation of Radionuclide Information Developed by DOE Hiqh-Level Nuclear Waste Repository Site Projects: Semiannual Report for October 1985-March 1986, NUREG/CR-4708, ORNL/TM10147, Vol. 1, No. 1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 1987.Google Scholar
4. Meyer, R. E., Arnold, W. D., Case, F. I., O’Kelley, G. D., and Land, J. F., Effects on Mineralogy on Sorption of Strontium and Cesium Onto Calico Hills Tuff, NUREG/CR-5463 ORNL-6589, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1987.Google Scholar
5. Ames, L L. Jr., The American Mineralogist, 46, 689 (1960).Google Scholar
6. Ames, L. L. Jr., The American Mineralogist, 49, 127 (1964).Google Scholar
7. Ames, L. L. Jr., The American Mineralogist, 49, 1099 (1964).Google Scholar