Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:37:43.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Localized Holes on Charge Transport, Local Structure and Spin Dynamics in the Metallic State of CMR La1-xCaxMnO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. H. Heffner
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
M. F. Hundley
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
C. H. Booth
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 Physics Department, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697
Get access

Abstract

We review resistivity, x-ray-absorption fine-structure (XAFS) and muon spin relaxation (μSR) data which provide clear evidence for localized holes causing polaron distortion and unusual spin dynamics below Tc in “colossal magnetoresistive” (CMR) La1-xCaxMnO3. Resistivity measurements for x=0.33 under an applied field H have shown that ln[ρ(H,T)] α -M, where M is the magnetization. The XAFS data show a similar functional dependence for the polaron distortions on M. The data from these two measurements are interpreted in terms of some fraction of the available holes x remaining localized and some increasing fraction becoming delocalized with increasing M. Finally, this polaron-induced spatial inhomogeneity yields anomalously slow, spatially inhomogeneous spin dynamics below Tc, as shown in the μSR data. These experiments individually probe the charge, lattice and spin degrees of freedom in this CMR system and suggest that the polarons retain some identity even at temperatures significantly below Tc.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Volger, J., Physica 20, 49 (1954).Google Scholar
2. Zener, C., Phys. Rev. 82, 403 (1951).Google Scholar
3. Anderson, P. W. and Hasegawa, H., Phys. Rev. 100, 675 (1955).Google Scholar
4. deGennes, P. G., Phys. Rev. 118, 141 (1960).Google Scholar
5. Kusters, R. M., Singleton, J., Keen, D. A., McGreevy, R., and Hayes, W., Physica B 155, 362 (1989);Google Scholar
Chahara, K., Ohuo, T., Kasai, M., and Kozono, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 1990 (1993);Google Scholar
von Helmholt, R., Wecker, J., Holzapfel, B., Schultz, L., and Samwer, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2331 (1993);Google Scholar
Jin, S., McCormack, M., Tiefel, T. H., Fleming, R. M., Phillips, J., and Ramesh, T., Science 264, 413 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Millis, A. J., Littlewood, P. B., and Shraiman, B. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Hundley, M. F., Hawley, M., Heffher, R. H., Jia, Q. X., Neumeier, J. J., Tesmer, J., Wu, X. D., and Thompson, J. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 860 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Jaime, M., Salamon, M. B., Rubinstein, M., Treece, R. E., Horwitz, J. S., and Chrisey, D. B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 68, 1576 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Billinge, S. J. L., DiFrancesco, R. G., Kwei, G. H., Neumeier, J. J., and Thompson, J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 715(1996).Google Scholar
10. Booth, C. H., Bridges, F., Snyder, G. J., and Geballe, T. H., Phys. Rev. B 54, R15606 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Zhao, G., Conder, K., Keller, H., and Müller, K. A., Nature 381, 676 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Heffher, R.H., Le, L.P., Hundley, M.F., Neumeier, J.J., Luke, G.M., Kojima, K., Nachumi, B., Uemura, Y.J., MacLaughlin, D.E., and Cheong, S-W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1869 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Jaime, M., Salamon, M.B., Rubinstein, M., Treece, R.E., Horwitz, J.S., and Chrisey, D.B., Phys. Rev. B 54, 11914(1996).Google Scholar
14. Jaime, M., Hardner, H.T., Salamon, M.B., Rubinstein, M., Dorsey, P., and Emin, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 951 (1997);Google Scholar
Hundley, M.F. and Neumeier, J.J., Phys. Rev. B 55, 11511 (1997).Google Scholar
15. Sun, J.Z., Krusin-Elbaum, L., Parkin, S.S.P., and Xiao, Gang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2726 (1995);Google Scholar
Chen, B.X., Uher, C., Morelli, D.T., Maniese, J.V., Mance, A.M., and Micheli, A.L., Phys. Rev. B 53, 5094 (1996);Google Scholar
Martinez, B., Fontcuberta, J., Seffar, A., Garcia-muñoz, J.L., Pinol, S., and Obradors, X., Phys. Rev. B 54, 10001 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Hundley, M.F., Neumeier, J.J., Heffher, R.H., Jia, Q.X., Wu, X.D., and Thompson, J.D. in Epitaxial Oxide Thin Films III, edited by Schlom, D.G., Eom, C-B., Hawley, M.E., Foster, C.M., and Speck, J.S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 474, Pittsburgh, PA 1997), p. 167.Google Scholar
17. Booth, C. H., Bridges, F., Kwei, G. H., Lawrence, J. M., Cornelius, A. L., and Neumeier, J. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
18. Booth, C. H., Bridges, F., Kwei, G. H., Lawrence, J. M., Cornelius, A. L., and Neumeier, J. J., submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
19. Zabinsky, S. I., Ankudinov, A., Rehr, J. J., and Albers, R. C., Phys. Rev. B 52, 2995 (1995).Google Scholar
20. Mitchell, J. F. et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 6172 (1996).Google Scholar
21. Poeppelmeier, K. R., Leonowicz, M. E., Scanion, J. C., and Longo, J. M., J. Solid State Chem. 45, 71(1982).Google Scholar
22. Louca, D., Dmowski, W., Egami, T., Brosha, E. L., Roder, H., and Bishop, A. R., Phys. Rev. B 56, R8475 (1997).Google Scholar
23. Millis, A. J. and Roder, H., private communication.Google Scholar
24. Millis, A. J., Mueller, R., and Shraiman, B. I., Phys. Rev. B 54, 5405 (1996).Google Scholar
25. Rôder, H., Zang, J., and Bishop, A. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1356 (1996).Google Scholar
26. Yaouanc, A. and Dalmas de Réotier, P., J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 3, 6195 (1991).Google Scholar
27. Wollen, E. O. and Koehler, W. C., Phys. Rev. 100, 548 (1995).Google Scholar
28. Dodds, S. A., Gist, G. A., MacLaughlin, D. E., Heffher, R. H., Leon, M., Schillaci, M. E., Nieuwenhuys, G. J. and Mydosh, J. A., Phys. Rev. B 28, 6209 (1983).Google Scholar
29. Lynn, J. W., Erwin, R. W., Borchers, J. A., Huang, Q., Santoro, A., Peng, J.-L., and Li, Z. Y., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4046 (1996).Google Scholar