Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:10.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Interfacial Zone Percolation on Cement-Based Composite Transport Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K.A. Snyder
Affiliation:
Bldg. Materials Div., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
D.N. Winslow
Affiliation:
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
D.P. Bentz
Affiliation:
Bldg. Materials Div., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
E.J. Garboczi
Affiliation:
Bldg. Materials Div., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

In portland cement mortar and concrete, interfacial zones exist around the aggregate particles that have larger pore sizes and pore volumes than the bulk cement paste. If there are enough aggregate particles present, these zones may overlap so as to percolate. A computer simulation model has been developed that can predict this percolation point as a function of interfacial zone thickness, volume fraction of aggregates, and aggregate particle size distribution. The model was used to simulate 1cm3 of mortar, using approximately 10,000 aggregate particles. Results from this model are used to explain recent mercury porosimetry results on mortars having a variety of sand contents. The implications of interfacial zone percolation for the transport properties of mortar and concrete are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Zimbelmann, R., Cem. and Cone. Res. 15, 801 (1985).10.1016/0008-8846(85)90146-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Garboczi, E.J. and Bentz, D.P., J. Mater. Res. 6, 196 (1991).10.1557/JMR.1991.0196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bentz, D.P. and Garboczi, E.J., Amer. Conc. Inst. Mater. J. 88, 518 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Detwiler, R.J. and Mehta, P.K., Amer. Conc. Inst. Mater. J. 86, 609 (1989).Google Scholar
[5] Clifton, J.R. and Knab, L.I., “Service Life of Concrete”, NIST Internal Report, NISTIR 89–4086 (1989).10.6028/NIST.IR.89-4086Google Scholar
[6] Stauffer, D., Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor and Francis, London, 1985).10.4324/9780203211595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Balberg, I., Philo. Mag. 56, 991 (1987).10.1080/13642818708215336Google Scholar
[8] Balberg, I. and Binenbaum, N., Phys. Rev. A 35, 5174 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevA.35.5174Google Scholar
[9] Lee, S.B. and Torquato, S., J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3258 (1988).10.1063/1.454930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Torquato, S., J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6248 (1986).10.1063/1.451452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] DeSimone, T., Stratt, R.M. and Sophia, Demoulini, Phys. Rev. Letts. 56, 1140 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Rikvold, P.A. and Stell, G., J. Chem. Phys. 82, 1014 (1985).10.1063/1.448966Google Scholar
[13] Rikvold, P.A. and Stell, G., J. of Coll. and Inter. Sci. 108, 158 (1985).10.1016/0021-9797(85)90246-2Google Scholar
[14] Winslow, D.N. and Liu, D., Cem. and Cone. Res. 20, 227 (1990).10.1016/0008-8846(90)90075-9Google Scholar
[15] Brakel, J. van, Powder Technol. 29 (1981).Google Scholar
[16] Scrivener, K.L. and Gartner, E.M., in Bonding in Cementitious Composites, edited by Mindess, S. and Shah, S.P. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 144, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988), p. 77.Google Scholar
[17] Scrivener, K.L., Bentur, A. and Pratt, P.L., Adv. in Cem. Res. 1, 230237 (1988).10.1680/adcr.1988.1.4.230Google Scholar
[18] Diamond, S., Mindess, S. and Lovell, J., RILEM, Liaisons Pates De Ciment Materiaux Associes, p. C42, 1982.Google Scholar
[19] Cochran, W.G., Sampling Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
[20] Garboczi, E.J. and Bentz, D.P.,, J. Mater. Sci. (1991), in press.Google Scholar
[21] Ping, X., Beaudoin, J.J., and Brousseau, R., Cem. and Cone. Res. 21, 515 (1991).Google Scholar