Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:48:53.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Flow Parameters on the Leaching of Nuclear Waste Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R. B. Adiga
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville,Florida 32611
E. P. Akomer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville,Florida 32611
D. E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville,Florida 32611
Get access

Extract

Environmental conditions in a repository are expected to be significantly different from those encountered by a glass tested under MCC-1 specifications. In addition to variations in flow rate and glass surface area to water volume ratio (SA/V), the water chemistry and presence of waste package components in the repository will most certainly affect the leaching behavior of the glass. The independent effects of each of these variables have been studied by numerous investigators. For example, it is well known that the leaching rate increases as the flow rate increases (1). Also, the rate of approach to saturation is increased as SA/V is increased under MCC-1 type testing (2). The use of silicate water generally decreases the rate of leaching while waste package components such as iron enhances the leaching rate of glass under MCC-1 type testing (3–4).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Strachan, D.M., “Effects of Flow Rate on the leaching of Nuclear Waste Glass,” Advances in Ceramics - Nuclear Waste Management, Vol.8, Eds. Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A., The American Ceramics Society, pp. 1218 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Ethridge, E.C., Clark, D.E. and Hench, L.L., “Effects of Glass Surface Area to Solution Volume Ratio on Glass Corrosion,” Physics and Chemistry of Glasses, 10[2] pp. 3540 (1979).Google Scholar
3. McVay, G.L. and Buckwalter, C.O., “The Effect of Iron on Waste Glass Leaching,” PNL-SA-10474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1982).Google Scholar
4. Wicks, G.G., Robnett, B.M., and Rankin, W.E., Chemical Durability of Glass Containing SRP Waste–Leachability Characteristics, Protective Layer Formation, and Repository System Interactions,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. V, Ed., Lutze, W., Elsevier Science Pub. Co., pp. 1524 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Kirscher, J.F. and Bradley, D.J., “NWTS Waste Package Design and Materials Testing,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol 6, Ed., Brookins, D.G., Elsevier Science Pub. Co., pp. 383390 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Jones, T.E., “Reference Materials Chemistry–Synthetic Groundwater Formulation,” RHO-BW-ST-37 P, Rockwell Handford Operations, Richland, Washington (1982).Google Scholar
7. Private communication.Google Scholar