Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:30:17.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Chemical Functionalization vs. Biological Functionalization on Nanoparticle Binding Affinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jason J Benkoski
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Milton Eisenhower Research Center, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, MS 9-110, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States, 443-778-5140, 443-778-5850
Julia J Patrone
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Milton Eisenhower Research Center, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
James Crookston
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Milton Eisenhower Research Center, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Huong Le
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Milton Eisenhower Research Center, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Jennifer Sample
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Milton Eisenhower Research Center, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Get access

Abstract

Due to their small size, high diffusivity, and chemically active surfaces, nanoparticles share much in common with water-soluble proteins. These similarities have generated great interest in using biofunctional nanoparticles as a route to deliver targeted therapeutics. Already nanoparticles have found applications in the hyperthermia of tumors, personal care lotions, and tissue scaffolding. Our study focuses on the targeting of such nanoparticles to specific biological sites. It therefore seeks to identify the factors that control the migration and capture of nanoparticles within living systems. In particular, we examine the affinity of anti-collagen coated magnetite nanoparticles for collagen IV-coated surfaces under flow stress. The studies are performed within microfluidic devices that are designed to mimic various fluid flow patterns within the body. We find, in this case, a large background signal due to nonspecific binding. Further examination shows a correlation between chemical functionality (e.g., surface charge, hydrophilicity) that suggests that a balanced approach between biological functionality and chemical functionality may reduce the background from nonspecific binding to acceptable levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zambaux, M. F.; Bonneaux, F.; Gref, R.; Maincent, P. J. Controlled Release 1998, 50, 31.Google Scholar
2. Schievink, W. I. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 2840.Google Scholar
3. Hashimoto, T.; Meng, H.; Young, W. L. Neurol. Res. June 2006, 28, 372380(9).Google Scholar
4. Kilic, T.; Sohrabifar, M.; Kurtkaya, O.; Yildirim, O.; Elmaci, I.; Gunel, M.; Pamir, M. N. Neurosurgery 2005, 57, 997-1007; discussion 9971007.Google Scholar