Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:31:18.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Boron Doping on the Grain Growth Behaviour of γ/γ Nickel-Aluminium Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Y.L. Chiu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, P.R.China
A.H.W. Ngan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, P.R.China
Get access

Abstract

Effects of 0.5 at. % boron doping on Ni85Al γ/γ superalloys were investigated for the first time, yielding a number of observations not previously observed in the literature. First, the grain growth kinetics of both the doped and undoped alloys were found to disobey the simple Nielsen law d = Ctn but instead follow an equation of the type d = C ln(t) + C0. The constants C and C0 were found to be respectively 10.2 and 23.2 for the boron-free alloy, and 6.2 and 14.2 for the boron-doped alloy, i.e., the grain growth rate was retarded significantly upon boron doping. Such a retarding effect is thought to be due to the formation of a boron-nickel cosegregated zone observed at the grain boundaries of the doped alloy; the width of the zone, in μm's, is two to three orders of magnitude larger than the boron induced disordered layer found in nickel rich Ni3Al compounds doped with boron. Other associated effects of the cosegregated zone include a sharp increase in toughness, much better slip transmission across grains and reduced workhardening rates. Another intriguing point is that the γ precipitates were found to segregate to the grain boundaries in the boron-free alloy after cold rolling, but no such segregation of γ precipitates has been observed in the boron-doped alloy. The different deformation microstructures and the retarded grain growth rates upon boron doping will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aoki, K., Izumi, O., J. Jap. Inst. Metals, 43, 1190 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Liu, C. T., White, C. L., Horton, J. A., Acta Metall., Vol. 33, pp.213229 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Ito, O., and Tamaki, H., Acta metall. Mater., 43, 2731 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Wang, F.H., Wang, C.Y., and Yang, J.L., J. Phys.: Condens. Mater., 8, 5527 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Frank, S., Rüsing, J., Herzig, Chr., Intermetallics, 4, 601611 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Wan, X.J., Zhu, J.H., and Jing, K.L., Scripta Metall. Mater., 31, 677 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Lee, K.H., Lukowski, J.T., and White, C.L., Scripta Mater. 35, 1153 (1996).Google Scholar
8. King, A.H. and Yoo, M. H., Scripta Metall., 1987, Vol. 21, pp. 11151119.Google Scholar
9. Schulson, E. M., Weihs, T. P., Baker, I., Frost, H. J. and Horton, J. A., Acta metall., Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 13951399 (1986)Google Scholar
10. Yang, Y., and Baker, I., Scripta Mater., 34, 803 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Zhou, B., Chou, Y.T., and Liu, C.T., Intermetallics, 1, 217 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Choudhury, A., White, D.L., and Brooks, C.R., Scripta Metall., 20, 1061 (1986),Google Scholar
13. Sieloff, D. N., Brenner, S.S. and Ming-Jian, Hua, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 133, pp. 155160. (1989).Google Scholar
14. Lin, D.L., Chen, D. and Lin, H., Acta metall. mater., Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 523528 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Cahn, R. W., Siemers, P. A., and Hall, E. L., Acta metall., Vol.35, 2753 (1987)Google Scholar
16. Baker, I. and Schulson, E. M., Scripta Metall., Vol. 23, pp. 18831886 (1989).Google Scholar
17. Khadkikar, P. S., Vedula, K., and Shabel, B. S., Metall. Trans., Vol. 18A, pp. 425428 (1987).Google Scholar