Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:40:10.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Barrier Width on Spectral Response of Strained Layer Superlattices for High Efficiency Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Geoffrey K. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Conrad Zachary Carlin
Affiliation:
Peter C. Colter
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Jeffrey L. Harmon
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Joshua P. Samberg
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Salah M. Bedair
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Get access

Abstract

Characteristics of strained layer superlattices (SLS) consisting of alternating layers InxGa1-xAs and GaAs1-yPy are examined for use in high efficiency solar cells. The effects of SLS quantum barrier widths on tunneling probability and short circuit current are discussed through analysis of J-V and spectral response measurements. Results indicate a threshold barrier thickness for which tunneling effects are deleterious. Effect of the number of SLS periods incorporated into a p-i-n structure and maximum number of periods are presented through spectral response and CV analysis. It is demonstrated that SLS show increasing responsivity with increasing number of periods due to higher absorption. CV analysis is performed to determine zero bias depletion widths for verifying appropriate number of SLS periods and fully depleted SLS region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bedair, S.M. Hauser, J.R. and Lamorte, M. Applied Physics Letters, 34 (1979) 38.Google Scholar
2 King, R. R. Boca, A. Hong, W. Liu, X.-Q. Bhusari, D. Larrabee, D. Edmondson, K. M. Law, D. C. Fetzer, C. M. Mesropian, S. and Karam, N. H. “Band-Gap-Engineered Architectures For High-Efficiency Multijunction Concentrator Solar Cells.” 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 2125 Sep. 2009.Google Scholar
3 King, R.R. Law, a_D.C. Edmondson, K.M. Fetzer, C.M. Kinsey, G.S. Yoon, H. Sherif, R.A., and Karam, N.H.40% efficient metamorphic GaInP/GaInAs/Ge multijunction solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters 90, 183516, May 2007.Google Scholar
4 Katsuyama, T. Tischler, M.A. Moore, D. Hamaguchi, N. Elmasry, N.A. and Bedair, S.M. New approaches for high efficiency cascade solar cells,” Solar Cells, vol. 21, Aug. 1987, pp. 413418.Google Scholar
5 Samberg, J.P. Carlin, C.Z. Bradshaw, G.K. Colter, P.C. Bedair, S.M.. MRS Fall 2009. To be published.Google Scholar
6 Connolly, J.P., Ballard, I.M., Barnham, K.W.J., Bushnell, D.B., Tibbits, T.N.D., Roberts, J.S.. “Efficiency Limits Of Quantum Well Solar Cells,” Solar Cells”, Proc. 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Paris, France, June 2004.Google Scholar
7 Schroder, D. K.. “Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization,” 3rd Edition, Hoboken, New Jersey, Wiley-Interscience, 2006.Google Scholar