Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:14.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Alpha, Gamma, and Alpha-Recoil Radiation on Borosilicate Glass Containing Savannah River Plant Defense High-Level Nuclear Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ned E. Bibler*
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina 29808
Get access

Abstract

At the Savannah River Plant, the reference process for the immobilization of defense high-level waste (DHLW) for geologic storage is vitrification into borosilicate glass. During geologic storage for 106y, the glass would be exposed to ∼3 × 1010 rad of β radiation, ∼1010 rad of γ radiation, and 1018 particles/g glass for both α and α-recoil radiation. This paper discusses tests of the effect of these radiations on the leachability and density of the glass. No effect of the radiations was detected that reduced the effectiveness of the glass for long-term storage of DHLW even at doses corresponding to 106 years storage for the actual glass. For the tests, glass containing simulated DHLW was prepared from frit of the reference composition. Three methods were used to irradiate the glass: external irradiations with beams of ∼200 keV or Pb ions, internal irradiations with Cm–244 doped glass, and external irradiations with Co–60 γ rays. Results with both Xe and Pb ions indicate that a dose of 3 × 1013 ions/cm2 (simulating >106 years storage) does not significantly increase the leachability of the glass in deionized water. Tests with Cm–244 doped glass show no increase in leach rate in deionized water up to a dose of 1.3 × 1018 α and α-recoils/g glass. The density of the Cm–244 doped glass has decreased by 1% at a dose of 1018 particles/g glass. With γ-radiation, the density has changed by <0.05% at a dose of 8.5 × 1010 rad. Results of leach tests in deionized water and brine indicated that this very large dose of γ-radiation increased the leach rate by only 20%. Also, the leach rates are 3 to 4 times lower in brine.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Baxter, R. G., USDOE Report DP-1606, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC (1981).Google Scholar
2. For a review see: Weber, W. J. and Roberts, F. P., USDOE Report PNL-3802, Battelle Northwest Laboratory (1981).Google Scholar
3. Bibler, N. E. and Kelley, J. A., USDOE Report DP-1482, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC (1978).Google Scholar
4. Dran, J. C., Maurette, M., and Petit, J. C., Science 209, 1518 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Mendel, J. E., USDOE Report PNL-3318, Battelle Northwest Laboratory (1980).Google Scholar
6. Chick, L. A., McVay, G. L., Mellinger, G. B., and Roberts, F. P., USDOE Report PNL-3465, Battelle Northwest Laboratory (1980).Google Scholar