Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:54:10.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Surface Geometry on Stress Generation in Thermal Barrier Coatings During Plasma Spray Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Guosheng Ye
Affiliation:
Department of Manufacturing Engineering Boston University, Brookline, MA 02246, U.S.A.
Soumendra Basu
Affiliation:
Department of Manufacturing Engineering Boston University, Brookline, MA 02246, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A fully coupled thermo-mechanical finite element model was used to study the buildup of stresses during splat solidification, and to understand the effect of deposition conditions on crack formation during plasma spray deposition. Through the simulation, the locations and magnitudes of maximum stresses were identified, where crack formation would presumably initiate. The model showed that the stresses scaled with the temperature difference between the superheated splat and the substrate. The simulation further showed that the stresses scale with the three geometric parameters, and two independent geometric ratios were defined; ζ (defined as t/λ) and ψ (defined as A/λ). 2D maps of maximum S11 and S22 under different combinations of ζ and ψ were constructed. The mappings showed that only roughness features on the scale of splat thickness were important in providing locations of maximum stress concentration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bengtsson, P., Segmentation Cracks in Plasma Sprayed Thick Thermal Barrier Coatings. PhD Dissertation, Linkoeping University, Linkoeping, Sweden 1997.Google Scholar
2. Freborg, A.M., Ferguson, B.L., Brindley, W.J. and Petrus, G.J., Materials Science and Engineering A, 245 (1998) 182190.Google Scholar
3. Bengtsson, P. and Johanneson, T., Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 4 (1995) 245251.Google Scholar
4. Friis, M., Persson, C., C, and Wigren, J., Surface and Coatings Technology, 141 (2001) 115127.Google Scholar
5. Llavsky, J., Allen, A.J., Long, G.G., Krueger, S., Brendt, C.C. and Herman, H., Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 80 (1997) 733742.Google Scholar
6. Malmberg, S. and Heberlein, J., Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2 (1993) 339.Google Scholar
7. Sampath, S., Jiang, X.Y., Matejicek, J., Leger, A.C. and Vardelle, A., Materials Science and Engineering A, 272 (1999) 181188.Google Scholar
8. Sampath, S. and Jiang, X., Materials Science and Engineering A, 304–306 (2001) 144150.Google Scholar
9. Jiang, X., Wan, Y., Herman, H. and Sampath, S., Thin Solid Films, 385 [2] (2001) 132141.Google Scholar
10. McPherson, R., Thin Solid Films, 82 [12] (1981) 297310.Google Scholar
11. Prystay, M., Guogeon, P. and Moreau, C., Thermal Spray: Practical Solutions for Engineering Problems. Brendt, C.C., editor. ASM International, Materials Park, OH. (1996) 517.Google Scholar
12. Madejski, J., Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 19 (1976) 1009.Google Scholar
13. ABACUS is licensed by Abacus Inc., Pawtucket, RI.Google Scholar