Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:52:14.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Substrate Surface Modification on Biomineralization of Osteoblasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yizhi Meng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Psychology A, 3rd Floor, Stony Brook, NY, 11784-2580, United States, 631-632-8607, 631-632-8577
Xiaolan Ba
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science & Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Seo-Young Kwak
Affiliation:
[email protected], Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Synchrotron Light Source, Upton, NY, 11973, United States
Elaine DiMasi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Synchrotron Light Source, Upton, NY, 11973, United States
Meghan Ruppel
Affiliation:
[email protected], Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Synchrotron Light Source, Upton, NY, 11973, United States
Lisa Miller
Affiliation:
[email protected], Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Synchrotron Light Source, Upton, NY, 11973, United States
Shouren Ge
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science & Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Nadine Pernodet
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science & Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Miriam Rafailovich
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science & Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Yi-Xian Qin
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Biomedical Engineering, Psychology A, 3rd Floor, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2580, United States
Get access

Abstract

Understanding how biomineralization occurs in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of bone cells is crucial to the development of a successfully engineered bone tissue scaffold, and to date there has not been a well-established method for the quantitative examination of bone mineralization in situ. We investigated the mechanical properties of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells and the crystalline properties of their biomineralized ECM in vitro using shear modulation force microscopy (SMFM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The elastic modulus of the mineralizing cells increased at time points corresponding to mineral production, whereas that of the non-mineralizing cells did not vary significantly over time. CLSM showed a restructuring of the F-actin fiber network of mineralizing cells with time, which indicates remodeling activities in the cytoskeleton and was not seen in the non-mineralizing cells. Both XRD and FTIR showed that the mineralizing subclone produced hydroxyapatite in situ and that the non-mineralizing subclone was in fact weakly biomineralizing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/falls.htm [Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2005. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.]Google Scholar
2. Bonewald, L. F., Harris, S. E., Rosser, J. et al., Calcified Tissue International 72 (5), 537 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Declercq, H. A., Verbeeck, R. M. H., De Ridder, Lifjm et al., Biomaterials 26 (24), 4964(2005).Google Scholar
4. Ge, S., Pu, Y., Zhang, W. et al., Physical Review Letters 85 (11), 2340 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Marcus, R., Feldman, D., and Kelsey, J., Osteoporosis. (Academic Press Inc., 1996).Google Scholar
6. Takai, E., Costa, K.D., Shaheen, A. et al., Annals of Biomedical Engineering 33 (7), 963 (2005).Google Scholar