Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:49.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Substrate and Catalyst Properties on the Growth of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Sudheer Neralla
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina Agricultural &Technical State University, Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, 1105, Yanceyville St,, Apt # F, Greensboro, NC, 27405, United States, 336-681-7549, 336-256-1153
Sergey Yarmolenko
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina A&T State University, Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, United States
Jag Sankar
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina A&T State University, Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, United States
Vesselin Shanov
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Cincinnati, Chemical and Materials Engineering, United States
Yeo Heung Yun
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Cincinnati, Mechanical, Industrial and Nuclear Engineering, United States
Mark J. Schulz
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Cincinnati, Mechanical, Industrial and Nuclear Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Self-aligned arrays of long multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) from a gas mixture of C2H4-H2-Ar-H2O at 750°C. A catalytically active alumina surfaces coated with a thin layer of iron and supported by a Si/SiO2 substrate were prepared using pulsed laser deposition method. Combinatorial approach has been used for optimization of catalytic properties of the multilayered system Si/SiO2/Al2O3/Fe. Sixteen different combinations of catalytic surfaces having thicknesses of Fe (0, 1, 2, and 3 nm), alumina (0, 10, 20 and 30 nm) per sample were deposited on two Si/SiO2 substrates with silica thickness 150 and 500 nm. To study the effect of alumina phase on efficiency of catalytic surfaces two substrate temperatures 200 and 700°C were used to produce amorphous and γ-alumina phases correspondingly. This approach allowed the optimal structure of catalytic surface to be determined from 64 different substrates on 4 samples in a single MWCNT growth experiment, for a given set of processing conditions. It was found that most efficient growth of MWCNT arrays on amorphous alumina occurred at Fe nanolayer thickness of 2 nm while catalyst having γ-alumina layer has tendency to be more efficient at higher thickness of Fe. Catalytic substrate containing amorphous alumina has less sensitivity to thickness of iron while γ-alumina based catalyst has significant variation in catalytic activity with change of iron content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Melechko, A.V., Merkulov, V.I., McKnight, T.E., Guillorn, M.A., Klein, K.L., Lowndes, D.H., Simpson, M.L., Journ. of Appl. Phys. (2005), 97, 041301.Google Scholar
2 Schulz, Mark J., Kelkar, Ajit D. and Sundaresan, Mannur J., “Nanoengineering of Structural, Functional and Smart Materials”, CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL, 10/2005.Google Scholar
3 Kumar, D., Yarmolenko, S., Sankar, J., Narayan, J., Zhou, H., Tiwari, A., Composites Part B: Engineering (2004), 35 B (2), 149155.Google Scholar
4 Afonso, C.N., Serna, R., Ballesteros, J.M., Petford-Long, A.K., Doole, R.C., Applied Surface Science (1998), 127–129, 339343.Google Scholar
5 Kumar, D., Sudhir, N., Yarmolenko, S., Wei, Q., Sankar, J., Narayan, J., Pennycook, S.J., MD (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), 2002, 97, 291295.Google Scholar
6 Wei, Y. Y., Eres, Gyula, Merkulov, V. I. and Lowndes, D. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. (2001), 78 (10), 13941396.Google Scholar
7 Kukovitsky, E.F., L'vov, S.G., Sainov, N.A., Shustov, V.A., Chernozatonskii, L.A., Chemical Physics Letters (2002), 355 (5,6), 497503.Google Scholar
8 Kiang, Ching-Hwa, Goddard, W.A. III, Beyers, R., Salem, J.R., Bethune, D.S., Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (1996), 57 (1), 3539.Google Scholar
9 Meyyappan, M., Tubes, Carbon Nano, Science and Applications, CRC Press, New York, 2005, pp. 110111.Google Scholar
10 Quade, A., Wulff, H., Thin Solid Films (1999), 355–356, 494499.Google Scholar
11 Levin, I., Brandon, D., Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soc. (1998), 81(8), 19952012.Google Scholar
12 Andersson, J.M., Czigany, Zs., Jin, P., Helmersson, U., Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology, A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films (2004), 22(1), 117121.Google Scholar