Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:36:05.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Sintering Atmosphere on the Microstructure of Gold Nanoparticulate Film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Seonhee Jang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Central R&D Institute, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Hyejin Cho
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Sungkoo Kang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Joonrak Choi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Sungil Oh
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Jaewoo Joung
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Donghoon Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Get access

Abstract

Over the past few decades, metallic nanoparticles (NPs) have been of great interest due to their unique properties which distinguish them from those of bulk metals. Many attempts have been conducted to investigate the characteristics of NPs and their applications. However, the sintering process which converts metallic NPs to conductive film was not established yet. In this study, the microstructure evolution of Au NPs after sintering under different thermal condition was examined and the film quality was studied based on densification, organic residues and electrical resistivity. Au NP ink dispersed in a toluene were spin coated on Ni-plated FCCL or Si substrates and thermally treated in a furnace under different sintering profiles under various types of flows such as air, nitrogen (N2), or reducing atmosphere of formic acid (FA). The Au ink was consisted of Au NPs coated with an organic capping molecule. The capping molecules not only help NPs to disperse but prevent aggregation and precipitation of NPs out of solution. When the NPs are treated by thermal process, the surface ligands from capping molecule start to decompose and necking and melting of NPs occur producing the film with the electrical conductivity. The diameter of Au NPs was approximately between 5-7 nm with spherical shape. The Au film sintered under air showed only necking between neighboring Au NPs without further grain growth. When Au NPs films were sintered under N2 atmosphere, NPs fused together in clusters. Under sintering with flows of FA, a larger area of pores due to the volume shrinkage of the film was observed since an agglomeration and melting of NPs were considerably progressed compared to the film sintered under N2. Sintering with a flow of a single gas such as air or N2 showed organic residues in the film indicated by C-H or C-O stretch peaks. However, when mixed flows of FA and N2 were applied, there was no IR peaks from organic substances observed in the film. It is assumed that the organic capping molecules surrounding the Au NPs were removed significantly with sintering with two flows of FA and N2. The microstructure showed less pore distribution and lower level of organic residues compared to those sintered under air, N2, or FA atmospheres. The electrical resistivity was about twice of bulk value of 2.44 μΩ -cm. Overall Au NPs film sintered under FA and N2 resulted in a better sintering effect based on densification of the film and level of residual organics, translating into a relatively high electrical conductivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Buffat, Ph., Borel, J.-P., Phys. Rev. A 1976, 13, 2287.Google Scholar
2. Lehtinen, K.E.J., Zachariah, M.R., Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 205402.Google Scholar
3. Soininen, P.J., Elers, K.-E., Saanila, V., Kaipio, S., Sajavaara, T., Haukka, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, G122 Google Scholar
4. Lee, Y., Choi, J., Lee, K., Stott, N. E., Kim, D., Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 415604 Google Scholar
5. Aslam, M., Gopakumar, G., Shoba, T. L., Mulla, I. S., Vijayamohanan, K., Kulkarni, S. K., Urban, J., Vogel, W., J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2002, 255, 79 Google Scholar
6. Kapoor, S., Palit, D. K., Mukherjee, T., Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 355, 383 Google Scholar
7. Yi, S., Jung, J., Choi, S., Kim, I., Jung, H., Joung, J., Joo, Y., Elec. Comp. Tech. Conf. 2008. p.1277 Google Scholar
8. Albert, A. D., Becker, M. F., Keto, J. W., Kovar, D., Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 1820 Google Scholar
9. Jang, S., Joung, J., Oh, Y., Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 5613.Google Scholar
10. Jang, S., Seo, Y., Choi, J., Kim, T., Cho, J., Kim, S., Kim, D., Scripta Mater. accepted.Google Scholar