Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:41:42.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Plasma Substitutes on Sedimentation Rates and Viscosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Lawrence C. Cerny
Affiliation:
Utica College of Syracuse University and the Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, 2150 Bleecker Street, Utica, NY 13501-1787
Get access

Extract

About twenty years ago, The National Academy of Science-National Research Council's Committee on Plasma and Plasma Substitute, Division of Medical Sciences sponsored the Third Conference on Artificial Colloidal Agents. At that time there was some concern about the stability of dextran. Therefore there was the need for a more suitable artificial colloidal plasma volume expander. At this meeting the results were presented in order to evaluate the feasibility of using solutions of hydroxyethyl starch (HES). This polymer is a derivative of amylopectin, a “waxy” starch, containing only branched chains of glycoside molecules devoid of a linear component. It is prepared by first reacting the starch to acid hydrolysis and then with ethylene oxide in an alkaline solution. There are two distinct advantages to using HES as a plasma substitute. The first is the wide range of molecular weights that are available and the second is the degree of molar substitution, which is defined as the average nunber of hydroxyethyl groups reacted per anhydroglucose residue. It is this unique combination that is the major determinant for the rate of amylase hydrolysis and the time of retention. The half-life concentration parameter, that is, the time required for the concentration of HES in the bloodstream, following intravenous injection, to fall to 50 percent of its initial peak value, has a range of times from 24–36 hours for a weight average molecular weight, Mw, of 450,000 and degree of molar substitution, M.S., of 0.7 to 2–4 hours for a Mw of 40,000 and M.S. of 0.55, respectively [1].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mishler, J. M., Pharmacology of Hydroxyethyl Starch (Oxford University Press, New York, 1982) p. 36 Google Scholar
2. Geyer, R. P., in Perfluorochemical Artificial Blood, edited by Hasegawa, E. Kishimoto, I. (Proc. Postcongress Symp., The Xth Inernational Congress on Nutrition, Kyoto, Japan 1975) p. 319 Google Scholar
3. Cerny, L. C., Stasiw, D. M., Cerny, E. L., Baldwin, J. E., Gill, B., Clin. Hemorheol. 2, 355 (1982)Google Scholar
4. Cerny, L. C., Graham, R. C., James, H. Jr., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 11, 1941 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Misiaszek, E., Williams, R., Stasiw, D., Cerny, L. C., Biorheol. 14, 145, (1977)Google Scholar
6. Cerny, L. C., Cerny, E. L., Cerny, M. E., Baldwin, J. E., Gill, B., Crit. Care Med. 11 (9), 939 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Merrill, G. W., Koo, B. H., Salzman, E. W., Lindon, J. N., Brier, D. F., AIChE Symp. Series 74 (182), 90 (1978)Google Scholar
8. DeTraglia, M., Cook, F., Stasiw, D. M., Cerny, L. C., Biochem. Biophys. Acta 345, 305 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar