Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:28:38.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Photoresist Outgassing on Boron Clustering and Diffusion in Low Energy BF2+ Ion Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Peter Kopalidis
Affiliation:
Axcelis Technologies 108 Cherry Hill Drive, Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Serguei Kondratenko
Affiliation:
Axcelis Technologies 108 Cherry Hill Drive, Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Get access

Abstract

During high current ion implantation into photoresist-covered substrates, evolution of gaseous by-products of photoresist breakdown occurs that can affect the dose control of the process as well as diffusion and activation of the implanted dopants in silicon. The dosimetry effects are well understood and accounted for in modern ion implanter design. In this work, we report on the effect of photoresist outgassing on the distribution of boron concentration in silicon during the subsequent annealing process, boron electrical activation and sheet resistance measurements. Experiments were performed on mono- crystalline and pre-amorphized silicon and oxide covered wafers that help elucidate the mechanism of boron accumulation and diffusion. Higher carbon concentration on the wafer surface due to photoresist outgassing results in boron clustering and reduction of transient enhanced diffusion, leading to higher sheet resistance at low anneal temperature. Implantation through a thin oxide layer can be used to reduce carbon surface contamination and minimize the effects on the boron profiles and sheet resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Rafferty, C. S., Gilmer, G. H., Jaraiz, M., Poate, J. M., Luftman, H. S. and Haynes, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6031, (1997).Google Scholar
2. Mokhberi, A., Griffin, P. B., Plummer, J. D., Paton, E., McCoy, S. and Elliott, K., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. 49, 1183 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Kim, Y., Massoud, H. Z. and Fair, R. B., J. Elec. Mat. 18, 143 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Horsky, T. N., IEEE Proc. of the XII Intl. Conf. on Ion Implantation Technology, Kyoto, Japan, June 1998, pp 654.Google Scholar
5. Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J. and Poate, J. M., Mat. Sci. Eng. B36, 275 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Stolk, P. A., Eaglesham, D. J., Gossmann, H.-J. and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1370 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Lunnon, M. E., Chen, J. T. and Baker, J. E., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 2473 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Werner, P., Gossmann, H.-J., Jacobson, D. C., Gosele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2465 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Pinacho, R., Castrillo, P., Jaraiz, M., Martin-Bragado, I., Barbolla, J., Gossmann, H.-J., Gilmer, G.-H. and Benton, J.-L., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 1582, (2002).Google Scholar