Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:20:10.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Phase Formation on Glass Leaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Richard Haaker
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut für Kernforschung Berlin GmbH, Glienicker Str. 100, D-1000 Berlin 39, FRG
Gonter Malow
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut für Kernforschung Berlin GmbH, Glienicker Str. 100, D-1000 Berlin 39, FRG
Peter Offermann
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut für Kernforschung Berlin GmbH, Glienicker Str. 100, D-1000 Berlin 39, FRG
Get access

Extract

The leaching of nuclear waste glasses in aqueous solution is still considered to be the most important process when discussing a potential release of radionuclides. However, in the last few years it has become clear that the release mechanism under static leaching conditions is very complex involving several processes [1]. The kinetics gave no evidence for pure leaching (i.e. the alkali-ion exchange) which should result in a square root time law, or for pure corrosion (i.e. congruent dissolution of the glass) which should result in a linear time law. Moreover, fits using a combination of these two processes gave unsatisfactory results. This is certainly due to additional processes which are not considered by ion exchange and congruent dissolution. Some explanations may be the build up of alteration layers, saturation effects of some elements with phase formation due to solubility limits and disappearance of metastable phases. To describe such a complicated system thermodynamic data are needed and measurements of mass losses as well as analyses of leachates and surfaces layers have to be performed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mendel, J.E., compiler, 1984, Report PNL-5157.Google Scholar
2 De Batist, R., et al., 1983, Report EUR 8424EN.Google Scholar
3 Malow, G., compiler, to be published, Joint Annual Report 1983, EUR.Google Scholar
4 Malow, G., 1982, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management V, Lutze, W. ed., (North Holland, NY), p. 25.Google Scholar
5 Engelmann, Ch., editor, 1984, Report EUR 91268EN.Google Scholar
6 Lutze, W., Malow, G., Rabe, H., Headley, T.J., 1983, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, Brookins, D.C. ed., (North Holland, NY), p. 37 Google Scholar
7 Strachan, D.M., Krupka, K.M., Grambow, B., 1984, Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 5, 87.Google Scholar
8 Saha, P., 1961, American Mineral, 46, 859 Google Scholar
9 Marples, J.A.C., compiler, to be published 1985, Final Report 1980−84, EURGoogle Scholar
10 Cerny, P., 1974, Canada Mineral 12, 334.Google Scholar
11 Khumdadze, A.G., et al., 1970, Geokhimiya, 5, 588.Google Scholar
12 Brown, G., 1961, The X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals, Mineralog. Soc. London, Jarrold and Sons Ltd., Norwich, p. 297.Google Scholar
13 Roy, D., Mumpton, F., 1956, Econ Geol, 51, 432 Google Scholar
14 Grambow, B., this volume.Google Scholar
15 Freude, E. et al., this volume.Google Scholar
16 Wallace, R.M., Wicks, G.G.,1982, compiler Mendel, J.E., Report PNL-4382 UC70Google Scholar