Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:42:51.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Pad Surface Texture and Slurry Abrasive Concentration on Tribological and Kinetic Attributes of ILD CMP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ara Philipossian
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Scott Olsen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Get access

Abstract

Real-time coefficient of friction (COF) analysis is used to determine the extent of normal and shear forces during CMP and identify the lubrication regimes associated with the process. Pads with different surface textures and slurries with varying abrasive concentrations are used to polish ILD films over a wide range of operating parameters. Results show that by varying abrasive concentration and pad surface texture, one can cause the process tribology to change from ‘boundary lubrication’ to ‘partial lubrication’, to ‘hydrodynamic lubrication’. A two-phase model relating average coefficient of friction and Preston's constant is presented. At abrasive concentrations up to 9 percent, material removal is proportional to the extent of contact between the abrasives and the wafer. At abrasive concentrations between 9 to 25 percent, removal rate is directly influenced by average COF. A new parameter termed the ‘tribological mechanism indicator’ is defined and extracted from the data, which coupled with the information on COF and ILD removal rate, results in a series of ‘universal’ correlations. A qualitative model based on pad storage modulus is used to explain the trends.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sikder, A.K. Giglio, Frank and Wood, John. Optimization of tribological properties of silicon dioxide during the chemical mechanical planarization process. Journal of Electronic Materials, 30(12):15201526 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Sikder, A.K. Thagella, S. Bandugilla, U.C. and Kumar, Ashok. Effect of tribological properties of florine-doped silicon di-oxide films on chemcical mechanical planarization. Materials Research Society, 697: 17 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Philipossian, A. and Mitchell, E.. Performing Mean Residence Time Analysis of CMP Processes. Micro, Vol. 20, No. 7 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Olsen, S.. Tribological and removal rate characteristics of ILD CMP. Thesis, M.S. University of Arizona (2002).Google Scholar
5. Ludema, Kenneth C. Friction, Wear, Lubrication: A Textbook in Tribology. CRC Press, Inc., 1996.Google Scholar
6. Preston, F.J.. The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. J. Soc. Glass Technology, No. 11, 214-256 (1927).Google Scholar
7. Mahajan, Uday, Bielmann, Marc and Singh, Rajiv K.. Abrasive effects in oxide chemical mechanical polishing. Materials Research Society Symposium, 556: 2731 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Brown, Norman J., Baker, Phillip C. and Maney, Richard T.. Optical polishing of metals. SPIE Proceedings. 340: 4257 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Stavreva, Z. Zeidler, D. Plotner, M. and Drescher, K.. Characteristics in chemical-mechanical polishing of copper: Comparison of polishing pads. Applied Surface Science, 108:3944 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Steigerwald, Joseph M, Murarka, Shyam P and Gutmann, Ronald J. Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1997).Google Scholar
11. Shi, F.G. Zhao, B.. Modeling of chemical-mechanical polishing with soft pads. Applied Physics A, 67:249252 (1998).Google Scholar