Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:15:16.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Migration Energies on Reducing Overprediction in Radiation-Induced Segregation Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

T. R. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, M1 48109, USA
G. S. Was
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, M1 48109, USA
Get access

Abstract

Models for calculating radiation-induced segregation (RIS) in concentrated alloys based solely on differences in the magnitude of the vacancy driven flux typically overpredict the amount of grain boundary segregation. A simple sensitivity analysis is used to show that the overprediction may be linked to the choice of input parameters. By varying the Cr-vacancy migration energy from 1.300eV to 1.320 eV and the Fe-vacancy migration energy from1.300eV to 1.305 eV, well within their experimental uncertainty, RIS model calculations are brought into better agreement with AES and STEM-EDS measurements of grain boundary segregation in Fe-Cr-Ni alloys irradiated with protons at 7x 10−6 dpa/s at various temperatures and doses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Damcott, D.L., Allen, T.R., and Was, G.S., J. Nucl. Mater., in press.Google Scholar
[2] Simonen, E.P. and Bruemmer, S.M., these proceedings.Google Scholar
[3] Norris, D.I.R., Baker, C., and Titchmarsh, J.M., in Proceedings of the Conference on Materials for Nuclear Reactor Core Applications. Vol. 1 (BNES, London 1987) p. 277.Google Scholar
[4] Marwick, A.D., Piller, R.C., and Horton, M.E., in Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Behavior of Irradiated Metals and Alloys, Vol. 2, Harris, D.R., Ed., (Proceedings of the BNES Conference, Brighton, 11-13 April 1983) BNES, London, 1984, pp. 1115.Google Scholar
[5] Perks, J.M., Marwick, A.D., and English, C.A., in Proceedings of the symposium on radiation- induced sensitization of stainless steels. Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories. 23 September 1986 (CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, 1987) pp. 1634.Google Scholar
[6] Rothman, S.J., Nowicki, L.J., and Murch, G.E., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 10 383 (1980).Google Scholar
[7] Million, B., Ruzickova, J., and Vrestal, J., Mat. Sci. and Eng. 72 85 (1985).Google Scholar
[8] Carter, R.D., Damcott, D.L., Atzmon, M., and Was, G.S., in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water 106 Reactors edited by Gold, R.E. and Simonen, E.P. (Warrendale, PA:The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, 1993) pp.501510.Google Scholar