Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:26:54.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Line Width on Electromigration of Textured Pure Aluminum Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D.B. Knorr  and
K.P. Rodbell
D.B. Knorr
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department and Center for Integrated Electronics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590
K.P. Rodbell
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

Three conditions of pure aluminum films were deposited, patterned into electromigration test structures, and annealed at 400°C for I hour. The grain size distribution was essentially the same for all conditions, but the textures were substantially different. Electromigration failure distributions were developed at 225°C and 1 MA/cm2 for line widths of both 1.8 μm and 0.5 μm. Three conditions were tested at the wider line width while the strongest and weakest textures were evaluated in the narrow line width. Texture exerts a dominant effect at the wider line width where the lines are polycrystalline. The values of t50 increase as texture becomes stronger although σ varies from <0.5 for strong textures to >1 for a bimodal failure distribution in the weakest texture. In the narrow lines, the texture effect is substantially reduced, and the failure distributions are bimodal with a few early fails followed by a monomodal distribution characterized by a low cr. The electromigration behavior is discussed in terms of both texture and the line width to grain size ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 309: Symposium M2 – Materials Reliability in Microelectronics III , 1993 , 345
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vaidya, S., Sheng, T.T., and Sinha, A.K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 36, 464 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Kinsbron, E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 36, 968 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Iyer, S.S. and Ting, C.Y., IEEE Trans., ED–31, 1468 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Kwok, T., in Proc. of 1st Inter. ULSI Sci. and Tech. Symp., (The Electrochemical Society, Philadelphia, PA, 1987), p. 593.Google Scholar
5. Dreyer, M.L. and Varker, C.J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 60, 1860 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Cho, J. and Thompson, C.V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 2577 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Thompson, C.V. and Kahn, H., J. Elect. Mater., 22 (June 1993) in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Campbell, A.N., Mikawa, R.E., and Knorr, D.B., J. Elect. Mater., 22, (June 1993), in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Attardo, M.J. and Rosenberg, R., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 2381 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pierce, J.M. and Thomas, M.E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 39, 165 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Cho, J. and Thompson, C.V., J. Elect. Mater., 19, 1207 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Knorr, D.B., Tracy, D.P., and Lu, T.-M., in Evolution of Thin Film and Surface Microstructures, edited by Thompson, C.V., Tsao, J.Y., and Srolovitz, D.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 202, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp. 199–204.Google Scholar
13. Knorr, D. B., Tracy, D.P., and Rodbell, K.P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59, 3241 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Knorr, D.B., Rodbell, K.P., and Tracy, D.P., in Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics, edited by Lloyd, J.R., Yost, F.G., and Ho, P.S. (Mater Res. Soc. Proc. 225, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
15. Knorr, D.B. and Rodbell, K.P., in Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics II, edited by Thompson, C.V. and Lloyd, J.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 265, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 113–118.Google Scholar
16. Mei, S.-N. and Lu, T.-M., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A, 6, 9 (1988).Google Scholar
17. Knorr, D.B., in Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics III, edited by Rodbell, K.P., Filter, W.F., Frost, H., and Ho, P.S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 309, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) these proceedings.Google Scholar
18. Rodbell, K.P., Knorr, D.B., and Tracy, D.P., in Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics I, edited by Thompson, C.V. and Lloyd, J.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 265, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
19. Genut, M., Li, Z., Bauer, C.L., Mahajun, S., Tang, P.F., and Milne, A.G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 2354 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Kauer, I., Gust, W., and Kosma, L., Handbook of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion Data, Vol. 1, (Ziegler, Stuttgart, 1989), p. 118.Google Scholar
21. Agarwala, B.N., Attardo, M.J., and Ingraham, A.P., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 2381 (1970).Google Scholar
22. Sanchez, J.E. Jr., McKnelly, L.T., and Morris, J.W. Jr., J. Elect. Mater., 19, 1213 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar