Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:09:15.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Incident Kinetic Energy on Stress in Sputter-Deposited Refractory-Metal Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T.J. Vink
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven, Prof. Holstlaan 4, 5656 AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

In magnetron sputter deposition the intrinsic stress in refractory-metal films changes from compressive to tensile on increasing the working-gas pressure. This pressure dependence is linked to the particle transport process from target to substrate during deposition. In this work we apply a Monte Carlo (MC) technique to simulate the transport of sputtered atoms and reflected neutrals in a background gas. Specific examples of Cr, Mo and W thin film growth in Ar and Ne gas ambients are presented. Trends in thermalization of the depositing atoms coincided with the observed trends in the compressive-to-tensile stress curves, for the different target and working-gas combinations studied. Furthermore, a quantitative correlation between the stress transition pressures and the incident kinetic energy of both sputtered atoms and reflected neutrals during film growth was found. In this case the contribution of the latter species was weighted with a relatively low factor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Windischmann, H., Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 17, 547 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 d’Heurle, F.M., Metall. Trans. 1, 725 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Windischmann, H., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1800 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Davis, C.A., Thin Solid Films 226, 30 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Müller, K.-H., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1796 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Fang, C.C., Jones, F., and Prasad, V., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 4472 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Motohiro, T. and Taga, Y., Surface Sci. 134, L494 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Turner, G.M., Falconer, I.S., James, B.W., and McKenzie, D.R., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3671 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Vidal, M.A. and Asomoza, R., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 477 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Myers, A.M., Doyle, J.R., and Ruzic, D.N., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 3064 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Urbassek, H.M. and Siebold, D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 11, 676 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Thompson, M.W., Philos. Mag. 18, 377 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Urbassek, H.M., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. B 4, 356 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Stuart, R.V. and Wehner, G.K., J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1819 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Stuart, R.V., Wehner, G.K., and Anderson, G.S., J. Appl. Phys. 40, 803 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Eckstein, W. and Biersack, J.P., Z. Phys. B 63, 471 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Eckstein, W., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. B 18, 344 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Barker, J.A., Fisher, R.A., and Watts, R.O., Molecular Physics, 21, 657 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Rossnagel, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 19 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Vink, T.J., Somers, M.A.J., Daams, J.L.C., and Dirks, A.G., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 4301 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Hoffman, R.W., in Physics of Thin Films, edited by Hass, G. and Thun, R.E. (Academic, New York, 1966), p. 211.Google Scholar
22 Thornton, J.A., in Semiconductor Materials and Process Technology Handbook, edited by McGuire, G.E. (Noyes, Park Ridge, New York, 1988), p. 329.Google Scholar
23 Hoffman, D.W. and McCune, R.C., in Handbook of Plasma Processing Technology, edited by Rossnagel, S.M., Cuomo, J.J., and Westwood, W.D. (Noyes, Park Ridge, New York, 1990), p. 483.Google Scholar
24 Petrov, I., Adibi, F., Greene, J.E., Hultman, L., and Sundgren, J.-E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 36 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar