Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:56:06.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Impurities on Σ3 (111) Grain-Boundary Fracture in Tungsten—Atomistic Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Grujicic ,
H. Zhao  and
Genrich L. Krasko
M. Grujicic
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634–0921
H. Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634–0921
Genrich L. Krasko
Affiliation:
US Army Research Laboratory, Materials Division, AMSRL-WM-ME, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005–5096
Get access

Abstract

The effect of various impurities and micro-alloying additions (B, N, C, O, Al, Si, S and P) on the intrinsic resistance of the Σ3 (111) GB in Tungsten has been investigated using Molecular Dynamics simulation. The atomic interactions have been accounted for through the use of the Finnis-Sinclair interatomic potentials. The fracture resistance of the GB has been characterized by computing, in each case, the ideal work of GB separation, the Mode I stress intensity factor and the Eshelby F - conservation integral at the onset of crack propagation. The results obtained suggest that pure Tungsten is relatively resistant toward GB decohesion and that this resistance is further enhanced by the presence of B, C and N. Elements such as O, Al and Si on the other hand, have a relatively minor effect on the cohesion strength of the Σ3 (111) GB. In sharp contrast, S and P greatly reduce this strength making Tungsten quite brittle. These findings have been correlated with the effect of the impurity atoms on material evolution at the crack tip.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 492: Symposium S – Microscopic Simulation of Interfacial Phenomena in Solids… , 1997 , 371
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dowding, R. J. in Powder Metallurgy in Aerospace and Defense Technologies, vol. 2, MPIF, Princeton N.J., 1991.Google Scholar
2. Krasko, G. L., Int. J. of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, 12, 251 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Briant, C. L. and Banerji, S. K., Embrittlement of Engineering Alloys, Acad. Press, New York, 1983, pp. 21;Google Scholar
Guttmann, M. and McLean, D. in Interfacial Segregations. Edited by Johnson, W. C. and Blakely, J. M., ASM, Metals Park, OH, p. 261, 1979.Google Scholar
4. Grujicic, M., Zhao, H., and Krasko, G. L., Int. J. of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
5. Finnis, M. W. and Sinclair, J. E., Philosophical Magazine, A50, 45 (1984); correction:Google Scholar
Finnis, M. W. and Sinclair, J. E., Philosophical Magazine, A53, 161 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Grujicic, M. and Dang, P., Mater. Sci. Eng., 199, 173 (1995);Google Scholar
Grujicic, M. and Dang, P., Mater. Sci. Eng., 205, 139, 153 (1996);Google Scholar
Grujicic, M. and Du, J., Simul. Mater. Sci. and Eng., 3, 811 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Sih, G. C. and Liebowitz, H. in Fracture-An Advanced Treatise. Academic Press, New York, vol. 11, p. 67, 1968.Google Scholar